From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2D0p3e8003791 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 00:51:03 GMT Received: from mx.ineton.ro ([217.156.27.7] helo=mx.loginet.ro) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DAHJu-0001tk-Cs for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 00:51:02 +0000 Received: (qmail 6923 invoked by uid 204); 13 Mar 2005 02:51:01 +0200 Received: from mrness@gentoo.org by hera by uid 201 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (. spamassassin: 3.0.2. Clear:. Processed in 0.109881 secs); 13 Mar 2005 00:51:01 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: mrness@gentoo.org via hera X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.16 (Clear:. Processed in 0.109881 secs) Received: from tg-neamt1.ineton.ro (HELO ?217.156.27.36?) (217.156.27.36) by mx.ineton.ro with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 13 Mar 2005 02:51:01 +0200 Message-ID: <42338E75.1030602@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 02:51:01 +0200 From: Alin Nastac Organization: Gentoo Foundation User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041209) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] why went unusable versions stable? References: <200503120101.16451.list-gentoo-dev@net4u.de> <1110590519.10977.1.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1110590519.10977.1.camel@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE5A92A50099312FB2B18F3ED" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: d9cc36d2-cd19-4364-ad36-a1f49884b662 X-Archives-Hash: b27984d9e0d28bde3d77db8f217bc3e3 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE5A92A50099312FB2B18F3ED Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Olivier Crête wrote: >uOn Sat, 2005-12-03 at 01:01 +0100, Ernst Herzberg wrote: > > >>dev-util/esvn: >> >>0.6.8-r1 was masked, and has some crazy bugs, that this stuff is not usable >>for an 'enduser'. If you select an 'working directory', the last character of >>the path get lost. You have to create a workspace, select there a working >>directory, add the last character by hand.... >> >>OkOk, as long as this stuff is masked, no problem. BUT: Upstream has released >>a new version with this bug fixed. Why went the buggy version stable? And the >>new with the bug fixed version is masked? That make no sense to me. >> >>Can somebody explain that? >> >> > >Maybe you should ask MrNess... But he doesn't seem to think that testing >is important... > > > This package I happen to use at work, I could say I did more than a simple test. Do you suggest that, if this bug is real, I should know about? Do you understand that tests don't always detect bugs, right? --------------enigE5A92A50099312FB2B18F3ED Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCM451RZBYwhawvi4RAuV7AJ9YgJ6KjNNMGCvAgnFD0jp7umILHwCfQd1d 1X91o9OgtyQJSeqtlFcnVvo= =kKE5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE5A92A50099312FB2B18F3ED-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list