Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP system worthwhile?

["Luis F. Araujo" <araujo@gentoo.org>]

Grant Goodyear wrote:

>It's worth noting that a GLEP author need not be a dev, so those
>people, of course, would always require a surrogate to submit/revise
>GLEPs.  As for devs being able to upload/revise GLEPs, I'm not opposed.
>The reason that devs cannot update their own GLEPs right now is purely
>technical: the GLEP page is part of the www tree, and that tree has
>fairly strict permissions.  If opening up the GLEP directory isn't too
>much of a pita for infra, I certainly won't oppose it.  I would still
>prefer that GLEPs be run by one of the editors before being posted,
>since we may be able to help, but I wouldn't insist on it.  I would be
>very sad, though, if people took advantage of a more liberal policy to
>post poorly-thought-out junk.
>  
>
I agree with the GLEPs being run by one or several editors, i think
it will keep the proposals very organized among them, something important
for the whole glep.g.o structure.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list