From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP ??: Per-Category metadata.xml Files
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:07:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4231FA9E.2090500@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050311162421.404bb1e7@snowdrop>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Subject pretty much sums it up. I mentioned this in the sys-apps thread
> and no-one said it was a horrid idea... Since I'm asking for DTD
> additions it probably warrants a GLEP. Also, it'll be nice to get a
> quick easy 'Accepted, Implemented' up on the site :) This time, my
> efforts will not be thwarted by Donnie and his lame editor!
I don't see any need to thwart this one, since it depends on GLEP 31
already. =P
> * It would help developers better select a relevant category for their
> package, rather than dumping everything into ``sys-apps`` and
> ``app-misc`` as is done currently.
If it's difficult to search/browse, it may not help much.
> A new top level ``<catmetadata>`` element shall be added to the DTD to
> distinguish category metadata elements from the existing ``<pkgmetadata>``
> elements.
Why does it needs to be distinguished?
> The ``<herd>`` and ``<maintainer>`` elements are not generally relevant at
> the category level.
If they are, can they be used?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCMfqeXVaO67S1rtsRAtaZAKDtIr+cSQzbpwbNvTTv61KsJzOQQgCaApIp
L0zHo+bThPqTfmxIyRsqn44=
=bRlL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-11 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-11 16:24 [gentoo-dev] GLEP ??: Per-Category metadata.xml Files Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-11 17:02 ` [gentoo-dev] " Dan Meltzer
2005-03-11 17:44 ` [gentoo-dev] " Michael Cummings
2005-03-11 17:44 ` Michael Cummings
2005-03-11 20:07 ` Donnie Berkholz [this message]
2005-03-11 23:47 ` Chris Gianelloni
[not found] ` <20050311202114.6e2181c3@snowdrop>
2005-03-11 23:54 ` Chris Gianelloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4231FA9E.2090500@gentoo.org \
--to=spyderous@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox