From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2BK2tJ4001801 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 20:02:55 GMT Received: from c-67-171-150-177.client.comcast.net ([67.171.150.177] helo=[192.168.1.106]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1D9qLV-0003FK-8j for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 20:02:53 +0000 Message-ID: <4231F88A.1010104@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 11:59:06 -0800 From: Donnie Berkholz User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050203) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP system worthwhile? References: <20050311143951.GA27199@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <4231BE29.2020408@gentoo.org> <20050311155822.3c0e1ddf@snowdrop> In-Reply-To: <20050311155822.3c0e1ddf@snowdrop> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 0a35dce0-adf1-4308-9273-56aad102b081 X-Archives-Hash: b142fb3bd986799d26abe562b7cc6909 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:50:01 +0000 Ian Leitch > wrote: > | The effort required to get GLEPs even posted on glep.g.o is enough to > | put some people off. > > Lies! GLEP 31 took me half an hour to write, and I was mildly > intoxicated at the time. Not everyone is as brilliantly fast at ReST/XML as you. I can write the thing in no time, but it takes forever to figure out the proper markup for what I want to do with it. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCMfiKXVaO67S1rtsRAokbAJ9lryNC5MjFPiCX5wLlpcGEGf34vgCfT1HR Eteru/FthURDlp6nJa120Cw= =PQiW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list