From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from parrot.gentoo.org (lists.gentoo.org [156.56.111.196]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2BHeH1r007010 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:40:17 GMT Received: (qmail 20853 invoked by uid 89); 11 Mar 2005 17:40:13 +0000 Received: (qmail 4641 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2005 17:40:13 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (134.68.220.30) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Mar 2005 17:40:13 +0000 Received: from 81-178-209-222.dsl.pipex.com ([81.178.209.222]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1D9o7S-0003CZ-Qc for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:40:15 +0000 Message-ID: <4231D807.6030805@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:40:23 +0000 From: Ian Leitch User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050124) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP system worthwhile? References: <20050311143951.GA27199@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <4231BE29.2020408@gentoo.org> <20050311155822.3c0e1ddf@snowdrop> <4231C2D5.7000705@gentoo.org> <1110560759.21812.113.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> In-Reply-To: <1110560759.21812.113.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 3fdbbad9-ec87-4ccb-9ebe-ac42a09689e5 X-Archives-Hash: f5342dfecc4ddda1e1b0619a22875004 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Chris Gianelloni wrote: | You just described the current process. | | A GLEP can be modified and have the revision voted on as it stands. Yes, but: 1) The revision has to go through one of 2 GLEP editors, what's wrong with letting a dev do this themselves. I agree with genone on letting devs have CVS access. Pkus it's not obvious on the GLEP main page which GLEPs have been updated and require votes. 2) Voting is done on -dev, I can't think of a worse place to conduct a vote. We need a web interface to count and clearly display votes for each revision. Regards, Ian Leitch -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCMdgHefZ4eWAXRGIRAoN3AJ0V4QuQEoXvf7jPhgQcgIVSv4qMwQCggfP4 w1pt2X5pevf2SkbHaBoz154= =DdBJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list