public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Leitch <port001@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP system worthwhile?
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:40:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4231D807.6030805@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1110560759.21812.113.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Chris Gianelloni wrote:
| You just described the current process.
|
| A GLEP can be modified and have the revision voted on as it stands.

Yes, but:

1) The revision has to go through one of 2 GLEP editors, what's wrong
with letting a dev do this themselves. I agree with genone on letting
devs have CVS access. Pkus it's not obvious on the GLEP main page which
GLEPs have been updated and require votes.

2) Voting is done on -dev, I can't think of a worse place to conduct a
vote. We need a web interface to count and clearly display votes for
each revision.

Regards,
Ian Leitch

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCMdgHefZ4eWAXRGIRAoN3AJ0V4QuQEoXvf7jPhgQcgIVSv4qMwQCggfP4
w1pt2X5pevf2SkbHaBoz154=
=DdBJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-11 17:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-11 14:39 [gentoo-dev] GLEP system worthwhile? Grant Goodyear
2005-03-11 15:02 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-11 15:47   ` Daniel Ostrow
2005-03-11 15:50 ` Ian Leitch
2005-03-11 15:58   ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-11 16:09     ` Ian Leitch
2005-03-11 17:05       ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-03-11 17:40         ` Ian Leitch [this message]
2005-03-11 18:24           ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-11 20:28             ` Ian Leitch
2005-03-11 20:30               ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-11 21:01                 ` Ian Leitch
2005-03-11 21:30                   ` Martin Schlemmer
2005-03-11 22:07                   ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-03-11 18:39           ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-03-11 18:42             ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-11 16:28     ` Marius Mauch
2005-03-11 19:40       ` Grant Goodyear
2005-03-11 19:59     ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-03-11 20:13       ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-11 20:16         ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-03-11 17:03   ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-03-11 19:25   ` Grant Goodyear
2005-03-11 20:59     ` Ian Leitch
2005-03-11 21:10       ` Mike Frysinger
2005-03-11 21:31       ` Martin Schlemmer
2005-03-11 21:33         ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-11 21:54           ` Martin Schlemmer
2005-03-11 23:34     ` Luis F. Araujo
2005-03-11 16:10 ` Benjamin A. Collins
2005-03-11 16:34 ` Marius Mauch
2005-03-11 19:42   ` Grant Goodyear
2005-03-14 13:09 ` Thierry Carrez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4231D807.6030805@gentoo.org \
    --to=port001@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox