From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from parrot.gentoo.org (lists.gentoo.org [156.56.111.196]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2BG9o3j024763 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:09:51 GMT Received: (qmail 638 invoked by uid 89); 11 Mar 2005 16:09:47 +0000 Received: (qmail 22363 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2005 16:09:47 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (134.68.220.30) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Mar 2005 16:09:47 +0000 Received: from 81-178-209-222.dsl.pipex.com ([81.178.209.222]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1D9mhw-0003GA-Mr for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:09:48 +0000 Message-ID: <4231C2D5.7000705@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:09:57 +0000 From: Ian Leitch User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050124) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP system worthwhile? References: <20050311143951.GA27199@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <4231BE29.2020408@gentoo.org> <20050311155822.3c0e1ddf@snowdrop> In-Reply-To: <20050311155822.3c0e1ddf@snowdrop> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: d5426abe-2765-48d1-8c8f-0e402034bd3c X-Archives-Hash: 5358dd6e01369ec00c5068af0b456cd2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | | I propose that a dev is free to upload a GLEP in any state of | | completeness/correctness as they wish, devs can then vote on said | | GLEP. If the GLEP author makes changes, devs then vote again on that | | revision. This system also gives power back to the devs (and users if | | they're allowed to vote) and away from the GLEP editors. | | 'Any' state is asking for trouble. You can post non-finished GLEP plans | to the list in any state, but I'd expect things making it onto the site | to be at least in reasonable draft state. OK, that's fair enough, but just so long as the author can post a revised version and have devs vote on it again. The main reason for this is that it's hard to track changes made to a GLEP in a massive long -dev thread. Regards, Ian Leitch -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCMcLVefZ4eWAXRGIRAlXHAJ9nVGcarUlJoEUjb57N3T9ZzDqWdwCfexRK fY/QdqTl/GbAbwFOOhT9iY4= =sz/5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list