From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j29HernR023564 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 17:40:53 GMT Received: from mx.ineton.ro ([217.156.27.7] helo=mx.loginet.ro) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1D95Ax-0006tH-Ki for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 17:40:51 +0000 Received: (qmail 23798 invoked by uid 204); 9 Mar 2005 19:40:52 +0200 Received: from mrness@gentoo.org by hera by uid 201 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (. spamassassin: 3.0.2. Clear:. Processed in 0.087011 secs); 09 Mar 2005 17:40:52 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: mrness@gentoo.org via hera X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.16 (Clear:. Processed in 0.087011 secs) Received: from tg-neamt1.ineton.ro (HELO ?217.156.27.36?) (217.156.27.36) by mx.ineton.ro with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 9 Mar 2005 19:40:52 +0200 Message-ID: <422F3523.2000902@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 19:40:51 +0200 From: Alin Nastac Organization: Gentoo Foundation User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041209) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Please follow keywording policy References: <20050308185536.58ecbe3c@enterprise.weeve.org> <422EA7E2.4040206@gentoo.org> <1110386590.9520.260.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> In-Reply-To: <1110386590.9520.260.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig7015EDEC4ED362A05512F135" X-Archives-Salt: 30ea3c66-8072-4bc2-9570-d839ce069a31 X-Archives-Hash: 4cf5ca5bdeab9014428d8bf5afc92dd9 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig7015EDEC4ED362A05512F135 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Chris Gianelloni wrote: >On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 09:38 +0200, Alin Nastac wrote: > > >>I think the reason people drop arches is laziness of some arch herds. >>C'mon people, how hard can it be to see if it builds right on your arch? >> >> > >What arch do you use? Maybe we should trade in your box for a nice >sparc32 or mips box and see what you have to say then. Remember that in >many of these arches, all the machines are still measured in Megahertz >and not Gigahertz, and they are quite old. > >The arch teams are doing their jobs quite well, don't try to push blame >onto them. They shouldn't go around marking something stable just >because it builds and should test it. If they have no way of testing >it, then they don't need to stabilize it. It won't kill you to have a >single older ebuild in the tree for an arch. Either that, or you can >remove the keywords, as Jason mentioned, and file a bug against the >package to the mips team so they are aware that keywords have been >dropped from the package and that it will need testing to be >re-keyworded. Looking over that bug, it really looks like you flipped >out over nothing. It took them a week to respond. That isn't very >long, at all. > > Hmm.. it looks like I've overreacted. I was convinced that my request have been ignored for one month. My apologies to mips team and all... --------------enig7015EDEC4ED362A05512F135 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCLzUjRZBYwhawvi4RAvkcAKCw3z8NZ4afWu9PER3AMM/ZLMR9dgCfStnv LzvpkrxeELNGO+uSQ2iF4I8= =4R+o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig7015EDEC4ED362A05512F135-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list