From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j29GBWPp003353 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:11:33 GMT Received: from newton.random-chaos.org.uk ([195.82.107.148]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1D93As-00049F-B2 for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 15:32:38 +0000 Received: from [217.156.27.7] (helo=mx.loginet.ro) by newton.random-chaos.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.21) id 1D92U4-0003LA-4S for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 14:48:24 +0000 Received: (qmail 25038 invoked by uid 204); 9 Mar 2005 16:50:26 +0200 Received: from mrness@gentoo.org by hera by uid 201 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (. spamassassin: 3.0.2. Clear:. Processed in 0.091518 secs); 09 Mar 2005 14:50:26 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: mrness@gentoo.org via hera X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.16 (Clear:. Processed in 0.091518 secs) Received: from technosoft.ro (HELO ?192.168.19.2?) (217.156.27.32) by mx.ineton.ro with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 9 Mar 2005 16:50:25 +0200 Message-ID: <422F0D2E.1040301@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 16:50:22 +0200 From: Alin Nastac Organization: Gentoo Foundation User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041213) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Please follow keywording policy References: <20050308185536.58ecbe3c@enterprise.weeve.org> <422EA7E2.4040206@gentoo.org> <422EFCA6.2010607@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <422EFCA6.2010607@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD2B70AAD7FA3D49BA6319F42" X-Archives-Salt: e369a15f-6f75-42aa-bf1d-275a32069b75 X-Archives-Hash: adec98526f76066d33205bb4ce1b2933 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD2B70AAD7FA3D49BA6319F42 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Stephen P. Becker wrote: > Alin Nastac wrote: > >> I didn't dropped any keywords yet but I've been pretty close to that. >> See http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81702 for more info. > > > Congratulations, you just took something that pissed you off > personally and threw it up on the dev mailing list for the purpose of > attempting to make a point where there is none. Never mind that for > well over a week, you joined #gentoo-mips at least 6 hours before any > of us in there would even be awake, said only "mips team ping", and > then logged off 5 minutes later. You should have at least talked > directly to somebody before getting so pissed off. Remember, when > *you* want something, *we're* not likely to come track you down. > Ok, I could understand that none of the mips team are online when I want, but how about the bug mentioned above? One month I waited/begged/threat!!! For what? For some lousy script updates, which is not arch dependent anyway! >> C'mon people, how hard can it be to see if it builds right on your arch? > > > So you are suggesting that we should mark something stable if it > simply compiles? I really hope you don't apply this lazy method of QA > to everything you maintain, else I fear for the users installing those > packages. This is the main reason we didn't touch that package, > because none of us had the ability to test pppoe. If you had actually > made an attempt to talk to one of us when we were awake before running > your mouth, you would have known this. In fact, we probably would > have just given you permission to remove the keyword assuming that no > repoman breakage resulted. > Not every package that I maintain is tested by me! How can I test a dsl driver when I have no such device! I apply the good old rule that if a package has no open bugs for a month, it will be marked as stable. If I would do things you way, in this moment net-dialup would have at least 100 opened bugs with no one carrying about them. I urge you to look in bugzilla to see how many rightfully complaints are there regarding my work. Not as if I consider less about a dev who made a mistake (only who do nothing, does no mistakes)... It is OK to want to make more than a simple compile test, but from this to doing nothing when a fellow dev ask you to IS a big distance! A convenient excuse, nothing more... I didn't wanted to get so involved in this bug, but invalid bug reports started by the transition from -r2 are killing me. In rest, what do I care that your arch is outdated! --------------enigD2B70AAD7FA3D49BA6319F42 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCLw0yRZBYwhawvi4RAvAEAJ0fdSkMw4Lwd/chT0dHAJcYiEsCngCeId/Q L25UD2nk91Xmo+O2x+21xRE= =7kpD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD2B70AAD7FA3D49BA6319F42-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list