From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j297cDsa023166 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 07:38:13 GMT Received: from mx.ineton.ro ([217.156.27.7] helo=mx.loginet.ro) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1D8vlk-0002gu-4W for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 07:38:12 +0000 Received: (qmail 13559 invoked by uid 204); 9 Mar 2005 09:38:12 +0200 Received: from mrness@gentoo.org by hera by uid 201 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (. spamassassin: 3.0.2. Clear:. Processed in 0.086667 secs); 09 Mar 2005 07:38:12 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: mrness@gentoo.org via hera X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.16 (Clear:. Processed in 0.086667 secs) Received: from technosoft.ro (HELO ?192.168.19.2?) (217.156.27.32) by mx.ineton.ro with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 9 Mar 2005 09:38:11 +0200 Message-ID: <422EA7E2.4040206@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 09:38:10 +0200 From: Alin Nastac Organization: Gentoo Foundation User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041213) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Please follow keywording policy References: <20050308185536.58ecbe3c@enterprise.weeve.org> In-Reply-To: <20050308185536.58ecbe3c@enterprise.weeve.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigDE5D8A65639379552E45DEFB" X-Archives-Salt: fa3383c4-c4d3-4176-a5f8-b024b70bd22c X-Archives-Hash: bca21d417b17ec4e570183af90fa10a4 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigDE5D8A65639379552E45DEFB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I didn't dropped any keywords yet but I've been pretty close to that. See http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81702 for more info. I think the reason people drop arches is laziness of some arch herds. C'mon people, how hard can it be to see if it builds right on your arch? Jason Wever wrote: >Hi All, > >I'd like to ask that you all take the time to review the keywording >policy in the Developer Handbook. In particular, I'd like to draw >your attention to the section on "Upgrading Ebuilds" [1]. > >People have been getting good lately at either dropping keywords for >no reason and/or failing to notify or file a bug with the arches >dropped as to why. Chances are if you have done this for SPARC, you've >probably heard from me already. If not, GenBot is on his way to your >location as we speak ;) > >Now back to your regularly scheduled hack-fu... > >[1] - >http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=2&chap=5#doc_chap5 > >Thanks, > > --------------enigDE5D8A65639379552E45DEFB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCLqfiRZBYwhawvi4RAsFqAJ9FVT+qeGdAAhAAGYn2HS+WLI4+ywCdGOpW 8V7J5nRPpELwhuAXOgj1B4o= =sFBJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigDE5D8A65639379552E45DEFB-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list