From: Jim Northrup <glamdring-inc@comcast.net>
To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-apps is too big
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 14:51:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <421D08DA.6030308@comcast.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <421D0435.9090304@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 653 bytes --]
does stage[123] [in|ex]clusion play a role in the "sys-" decision making?
if the portage tree grew nodal depth of namespace rather than just the
breadth, gentoo could be a leaner meaner vestige of its former nimble
self by having domains of visibility and overlays of decreasing
stability for which the sync bandwidth is committed.
presently regardless of keywords,all clients see all packages. if you
don't like it, you have to run your own infrastructure.
The fringe packages will always be under-maintained but a travelling
salesman algorithm for migrating packages on portage mirror resources
would certainly garner a glut of proposals.
[-- Attachment #2: glamdring-inc.vcf --]
[-- Type: text/x-vcard, Size: 175 bytes --]
begin:vcard
fn:James Northrup
n:Northrup;James
email;internet:glamdring-inc@comcast.net
tel;home:510 725 4587
tel;cell:408 896 6239
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-23 22:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-23 19:00 [gentoo-dev] sys-apps is too big Ciaran McCreesh
2005-02-23 19:07 ` Henrik Brix Andersen
2005-02-23 19:23 ` Martin Schlemmer
2005-02-23 19:35 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-02-23 22:31 ` tchiwam
2005-02-23 22:51 ` Jim Northrup [this message]
2005-02-23 22:55 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-02-23 22:51 ` Greg KH
2005-02-23 21:43 ` Olivier Crête
2005-02-27 20:23 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-02-27 22:09 ` Martin Schlemmer
2005-03-01 1:21 ` Robin H. Johnson
2005-03-01 1:34 ` Olivier Crête
2005-03-01 1:41 ` [gentoo-dev] x86 vs amd64 :: ppc vs ppc64 (was sys-apps is too big) Mike Frysinger
2005-03-01 1:49 ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-03-01 2:00 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-03-04 2:32 ` Kumba
2005-03-04 2:50 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-03-01 8:20 ` [gentoo-dev] sys-apps is too big Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-01 9:50 ` Martin Schlemmer
2005-03-01 10:40 ` Stuart Longland
2005-03-01 11:54 ` Georgi Georgiev
2005-03-01 12:11 ` Stuart Longland
2005-03-01 14:08 ` [gentoo-dev] " Thomas Kirchner
2005-03-01 14:37 ` Robin H. Johnson
2005-03-01 14:55 ` [gentoo-dev] " Thomas Kirchner
2005-03-01 15:37 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-01 23:21 ` Stuart Longland
2005-03-01 23:33 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-01 23:40 ` Robin H. Johnson
2005-03-01 23:46 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-03-01 23:48 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-01 11:12 ` Aaron Walker
2005-03-01 18:08 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-03 20:43 ` Ciaran McCreesh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=421D08DA.6030308@comcast.net \
--to=glamdring-inc@comcast.net \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox