From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60B08138350 for ; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 01:04:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB5BCE091B; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 01:04:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F6D2E08FC for ; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 01:04:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nemesis.wraeth.lan (124-149-125-193.dyn.iinet.net.au [124.149.125.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: wraeth) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0C44634ECC4 for ; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 01:04:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sam Jorna (wraeth)" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app-admin/kube-bench: convert to go-module go.sum Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 12:04:27 +1100 Message-ID: <4209235.LvFx2qVVIh@nemesis.wraeth.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <20200209203121.4646-1-robbat2@gentoo.org> <8551858.CDJkKcVGEf@nemesis.wraeth.lan> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2142873.ElGaqSPkdT"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 8d161948-c9a9-4ebe-b882-65600295b523 X-Archives-Hash: b4e751fbbd0fd27b51d2b7c8f46650f4 --nextPart2142873.ElGaqSPkdT Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Saturday, 15 February 2020 3:14:55 AM AEDT Matt Turner wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 12:31 AM Sam Jorna (wraeth) wrote: > > In this instance, at least two people (myself included) have drawn an > > impression that led them to voice their concern in some way (I'm unsure if > > mpagano was voicing concern or just agreeing with the general concept). > > Maybe we're the only ones. Maybe not. > > What do you think the threshold should be? If one person objects, > should ComRel cease and desist? Two? Should we have a Gentoo-wide > vote? > > I don't have the highest opinion of ComRel and I'm a member, but maybe > you could let us do our jobs? I didn't say ComRel shouldn't do their job, nor offered any opinion on ComRel whatsoever. I said people shouldn't be called out on what looks like a legitimate question, and that quote was illustrating one of the reasons why. The threshold I'm talking about would be "is this question, however it's worded, relevant to the subject." Having said that, if this is you wearing a ComRel hat telling me to mind my own business, so be it. -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) GnuPG ID: 0xD6180C26 --nextPart2142873.ElGaqSPkdT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEkOOCivPPbnU/QAv/9azmicmnVzwFAl5HQ5sACgkQ9azmicmn Vzx5XQ//T45VNzqcb3I7AYCNeuxqat3PzdiTdU44NBQJ9cWYWdRnP+4U/RakFz1w 8o1PQTDyqbsjQxCwJdPFPIwy/2dxKWFDngw/WSouSJ4KGRbycyhoZqEt29LeQWEU htCk1nUTGWX8GkaSXK9FVZ6YbclBUI0yRjx61JsAeBXJg1LYYrP6LdPetuTUYJc7 KNTc04o8qtyz0fx6NsT62P03fJH5iSaK2pa+ExbM2lXf4C38QILxvEx9CzcLdy4B PAQFr8QkWUkB0A0IzGlDE2j+n6MLHST8wjWjydJbF1L1EbpcmXQmQRnkWWh2hRHH A0bDagPwl66JKYxR9s2QacezUn3Cw7FNnvOg0CmCgpuoFjXPaAtlz6docEix+pUD YS1Rk7hXb2WXapoVbE7HBRxv1FQZxgvkWl/D3w3EVlO+El8ofkbFynnMw8kMdWu2 pTwPK9V/XRYJy2uxgXRjJAnO44nygNHiXNe9Hn2zD00tD6cWliwGlWFLQcQfmWEz L1kaqntnOyRd6RFofm5o2d+HJjHBjgZUPj/a9q0QyF0b+xeOdvZaL94FqHdKTgEC 1vnjKZYKEBnuucvdydAChryluwi4R1XKRrpa6XlrS2x6E6AYTjY8S6XqijFmkMf0 Krfwjd1MKvU2v8YkkgKk+sR8aZWjpPHTSi/6Azui1sMNP3EkKNc= =RC/j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2142873.ElGaqSPkdT--