From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C4CA138334 for ; Wed, 29 May 2019 09:34:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B2279E088C; Wed, 29 May 2019 09:34:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3060FE087E for ; Wed, 29 May 2019 09:34:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thinkpad.fritz.box (cable-static-141-78.teleport.ch [87.102.141.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: soap) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A6DF4345228; Wed, 29 May 2019 09:33:59 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <41d860e5d3affd02c5c1029e9d9c60039edcaf41.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] darcs.eclass: use BDEPEND with EAPI >= 7 From: David Seifert To: Ulrich Mueller Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, haskell@gentoo.org, slyfox@gentoo.org, Michael Haubenwallner Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 11:33:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20190529090043.12270-1-haubi@gentoo.org> <44a6d9beef596ffd2135c182a008a4d9474dd652.camel@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a95297ed-8f5e-4953-867c-359f16650f62 X-Archives-Hash: 6d6d8b49767cab5805dbff043f2204ff On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 11:31 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 29 May 2019, David Seifert wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 11:00 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > > > +case ${EAPI:-0} in > > > + [0-6]*) > > Why the *? Do we really care about EAPI="5-HDEPEND" and others? > > Worse, this will match EAPI 10. :) To be honest, I already have nightmares about the EAPI specifier becoming a two-digit number, so many globs will fail...