From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18033 invoked by uid 1002); 14 Jul 2003 09:40:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 11408 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2003 09:40:53 -0000 Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 11:40:51 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) From: Michele Balistreri To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <4187D37A-B5DF-11D7-9AB7-0003935414DA@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] app-cvs X-Archives-Salt: 1b238648-a61d-4533-be0f-bd32e70b952e X-Archives-Hash: 003816f803ce47e11e0131d3e011f53d But categories shouldnt categorize packages for what they do? I mean,=20 if i need something to do video editing, i go search in media-video. I=20= dont think app-cvs could let people think about cvs ebuilds, i would=20 think more about cvs related applications. In my opinion categories=20 shouldnt be used for such things, maybe add an herd "cvs" if there isnt=20= already is enough. Luned=EC, 14 lug 2003, alle 11:25 Europe/Rome, Tal Peer ha scritto: > Hi, > > While discussing the state of the php-cvs package on #gentoo_dev,=20 > lu_zero > suggested that we open a new category 'app-cvs' and move all -cvs=20 > packages > there. That way we don't litter all the categories with -cvs ebuilds=20= > that > most of users don't need/want. > > Comments? > > > Tal > > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > > Michele Balistreri Gentoo Developer, KDE Team Rome, Italy -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list