From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2170138334 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 20:21:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15907E08AB; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 20:21:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo6-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo6-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de [IPv6:2a01:238:20a:202:5305::9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A28C3E0887 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 20:21:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1570479686; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=akhuettel.de; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From: X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH:From:Subject:Sender; bh=IHW9XsvnoL5bnpU8a97yxw9ICMgvmdzDRqG3S7Y4riA=; b=UQJ2KEZ2OfKs4bRoYoGVYUbEpeFATqSIfd3+VYYZpGhpsY8P0RDggBx+NW4uCQBQU3 FiFLZh9DB/A4lK7TBunmUkYia3lHFBI06MMUwk0nTp/mZKlby2UkbEGSnsow/iLy1ODN uaPTAJOff7evQQbJar7F4xHfnIQePTWMX/dujC6Ge9bmgr33iBp+ugOnzX3/1s+PY8UB 2CQGmc/FM1/Ra2eXPbLZPoSBSlJYfVLK7CuBVGQEwSsZR9+p4hgRaNMTXdH9C1HwiYOm LfZlI2RHfTIl2Rm5pvBaLrYJnSm6+6NumlfecJRRuNO/Y38Y+YmngEVPEx9g5lwVqsxK dRtg== X-RZG-AUTH: ":IW0NeWCpcPchHrcnS4ebzBgQnKHTmkWA4CWORNSv8N53ayXF3oelfqZylz23SYAv" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from porto.localnet by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 44.28.0 SBL|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id f0ae7dv97KLG1pd (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (curve secp521r1 with 521 ECDH bits, eq. 15360 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate); Mon, 7 Oct 2019 22:21:16 +0200 (CEST) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: "Robin H. Johnson" , kensington@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stable-bot is down. Temporary? Forever? Can we have a contacts page for it? Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 22:21:11 +0200 Message-ID: <4170258.EnrzZEfU2y@porto> Organization: Gentoo Linux In-Reply-To: References: <20190926082842.16d58bdd@gentoo.org> <44e7f975-7844-45c6-4d33-15c688b7a5e0@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Archives-Salt: e073a1dd-0a5c-4303-8b39-e5ba6250c457 X-Archives-Hash: ae7ba419dc27fb1a7cb9017f9678f39d > >=20 > > Is it appropriate to list services that are not managed by infra on this > > page? >=20 > Yes, in the 'External-run' section of the page. I'll add a stub for > stable-bot now that we have some more details. In any case, since many people *do* rely on it, maybe we should declare it= =20 official? [+] And, if that's OK with both of you, move it onto infra hardware? Happy to sponsor both for the next council meeting agenda. [+] At some point the one remaining whiner doesnt count anymore. =2D-=20 Andreas K. H=FCttel dilfridge@gentoo.org Gentoo Linux developer=20 (council, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice)