From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28001 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2004 22:46:29 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Oct 2004 22:46:29 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CH8w0-0005be-QA for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 22:46:28 +0000 Received: (qmail 5179 invoked by uid 89); 11 Oct 2004 22:46:28 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 4391 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2004 22:46:27 +0000 Message-ID: <416B0E38.6050608@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 17:50:32 -0500 From: Daniel Goller User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040916) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Frysinger CC: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1097526348.30232.6.camel@helen.science.oregonstate.edu> <20041012064714.7d329e78@localhost> <200410111754.42423.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200410111754.42423.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.0-r1 ready to go stable on all archs X-Archives-Salt: 721032dc-3c0c-4e27-883d-1db6886924f9 X-Archives-Hash: 8299eba0b8a68a3773258f75c3de2d65 does 6.8.0-r1 check for ati-drivers being installed, and issuing notice and then bail out? i think it should, or you wont be able to close the "6.8.0 broken" bugs fast enough, Guess it is simpler to block on ati-drivers till ati-drivers are fixed. But to push 6.8.0-r1 out for anyone to upgrade knowing it will cause chaos doesn't seem wise. Mike Frysinger wrote: >On Monday 11 October 2004 05:47 pm, Stuart Bouyer wrote: > > >>How about compatabiltiy with ATI drivers? That would be bugs >>61574 (major) and 63924 (critiacal). >> >> > >considering it looks like a bug with ati drivers (which are closed source) how >can you expect the xorg people to 'fix' it ? > >if it's a bug with the ati-drivers ebuild, that shouldnt stop the xorg-x11 >people >-mike > >-- >gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > > > > -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list