From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-16134-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: (qmail 4289 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2004 04:30:27 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 28 Sep 2004 04:30:27 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CC9dC-0002et-V0 for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 04:30:27 +0000 Received: (qmail 10928 invoked by uid 89); 28 Sep 2004 04:30:26 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 8258 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2004 04:30:25 +0000 Message-ID: <4158E4A8.8030007@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 00:12:24 -0400 From: Travis Tilley <lv@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040921) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <7e9ef03fd63345e7af3df03cbe0cd98b@mudra> In-Reply-To: <7e9ef03fd63345e7af3df03cbe0cd98b@mudra> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] removing dhcpcd from system??? X-Archives-Salt: f3951e63-a635-41ef-bb6a-805d6a730343 X-Archives-Hash: fa11c93d87ca6a40b3ded2e100948512 Armando Di Cianno wrote: > This can be solved in a number of ways: a "support-net-dhcp" type use > flag, adding configurable support to baselayout, and then supports > scripts to a possible virtual/dhcp-client, etc. ...actually, if we want to remove dhcpcd from system, i would love to see something like this in baselayout. PDEPEND="!build ( dhcp-client? ( virtual/dhcp-client ) )" ...or something similar. that way a default virtual can be added, dhcp-client can be in a profile's USE, and a user could uninstall (or just not install) it without the profile forcing it to be part of the system profile. the best of both sides... maybe? feel free to beat me with something if i'm totally wrong here. :) Travis Tilley <lv@gentoo.org> -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list