From: Robert Moss <robmoss@gentoo.org>
To: Daniel Goller <morfic@gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 3.4 and ~x86
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 16:21:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <414C5273.7080005@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <414C4DF6.3010406@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 636 bytes --]
> 2004.0/2004.1? time warp? 2005.0/.1?
Heh, whoops, stupid Rob. 2005.0.
> ^^ yeah sure like we will have more devs help test a new toolchain, you
> forget it doesnt come with translucency and shadows, something that
> guarantees you plenty of (dev) testers, what's gcc, just some thing
> portage calls to build stuff, who would care about that?
> so much easier to complain about things than help fix them
True. But if it happens, and gcc-4.0 is in 2005.0, and all sorts of
stuff breaks because the devs ignored our pleas to test, then they can't
say we didn't warn them. Just like, well, what's happening with 3.4 and
~x86...
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 264 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-18 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-12 23:49 [gentoo-dev] GCC 3.4 and ~x86 Patrick Dawson
2004-09-13 0:24 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-09-13 0:33 ` Daniel Goller
2004-09-13 3:51 ` Luke-Jr
2004-09-13 4:30 ` Daniel Goller
2004-09-13 5:51 ` Seemant Kulleen
2004-09-13 19:20 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-09-13 22:00 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-09-14 8:54 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-09-15 8:21 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-09-15 14:54 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-09-18 7:44 ` Ned Ludd
2004-09-18 9:09 ` Robert Moss
2004-09-18 15:02 ` Daniel Goller
2004-09-18 15:21 ` Robert Moss [this message]
2004-09-19 3:20 ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-09-19 3:27 ` Ned Ludd
2004-09-19 8:01 ` Stuart Herbert
2004-09-19 15:22 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-09-18 18:40 ` Travis Tilley
2004-09-13 19:54 ` Joshua J. Berry
2004-09-13 22:02 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-09-14 13:57 ` Mike Frysinger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-09-11 18:43 Daniel Goller
2004-09-11 19:31 ` Ioannis Aslanidis
2004-09-11 20:30 ` Daniel Goller
2004-09-11 19:50 ` Ned Ludd
2004-09-11 23:09 ` Daniel Goller
2004-09-12 0:08 ` Alberto Garcia Hierro
2004-09-12 0:24 ` Robert Moss
2004-09-13 19:12 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-09-12 15:25 ` Norberto Bensa
2004-09-13 23:58 ` Stefan Jones
2004-09-14 5:54 ` Norberto Bensa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=414C5273.7080005@gentoo.org \
--to=robmoss@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=morfic@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox