From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-15680-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: (qmail 20568 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2004 23:49:36 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 12 Sep 2004 23:49:36 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C6e6C-0006C8-E0 for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 23:49:36 +0000 Received: (qmail 6357 invoked by uid 89); 12 Sep 2004 23:49:35 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 6869 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2004 23:49:35 +0000 Message-ID: <4144E08A.7020502@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 19:49:30 -0400 From: Patrick Dawson <pkdawson@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 3.4 and ~x86 X-Archives-Salt: a022da26-04b3-4b94-a97c-c2489e79b6ae X-Archives-Hash: cafb3010c14a740687e500d153cedc77 Daniel Goller wrote: > GCC 3.4 should be ready to go ~x86 w/o being profile masked in x86 profiles anymore. > There are no critical packages that dont compile with it. > If anyone sees a reason to not unmask it, let me know, otherwise we would like to unamsk it soon. Thoughts/comments on bug #57602? http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57602 It seems to affect many/most using xorg-x11 with -march=pentium4. There's a pretty simple fix, but no one from the X11 herd seems to have taken an interest yet. I'll update the bug ASAP with some more test results. I welcome any input from others who have compiled xorg-x11 on a P4 with gcc-3.4. ~ Patrick Dawson -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list