From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21402 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2004 08:27:51 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 6 Sep 2004 08:27:51 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C4Eqt-0007fm-6f for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2004 08:27:51 +0000 Received: (qmail 27799 invoked by uid 89); 6 Sep 2004 08:27:50 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 311 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2004 08:27:49 +0000 Message-ID: <413C1FE5.2040200@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 03:29:25 -0500 From: Daniel Goller User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040905) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Norberto Bensa CC: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <200409051342.17414.norberto+gentoo-dev@bensa.ath.cx> <200409051610.24456.norberto+gentoo-dev@bensa.ath.cx> <200409060823.17852.jstubbs@gentoo.org> <200409052258.48457.norberto+gentoo-dev@bensa.ath.cx> In-Reply-To: <200409052258.48457.norberto+gentoo-dev@bensa.ath.cx> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.85.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: problem with cascade profiles X-Archives-Salt: d3012750-12cb-4e03-88c6-b4c84106933c X-Archives-Hash: 1708cb4c78fd2d2da928614377cc6b62 ok, seems there is a bug in 2.0.50 parsing cascaded profiles, the make.defaults files are adjusted to this, thanks to jstubbs please sync 35 mins after reading this mail and test with your portage 2.0.50-r10 thank you Daniel Norberto Bensa wrote: >Jason Stubbs wrote: > > >>portage-2.0.50_pre20 no longer does fetching as root. Make sure that >>the /usr/portage directory also has write access by the portage group and >>it should work. >> >> > >Ermm.... This is a RO-NFS shared distfiles and the file was already fetched. > > > >>>[Why did I installed a pre version of portage ... ~:( ] >>> >>> >>There may be a couple of hiccups(sp?) but it should be smooth running after >>working them out. >> >> > >Thanks. I've reverted to 2.0.50-r10 until those hiccups are fixed ;) > >Regards, >Norberto > >-- >gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > > > > -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list