[gentoo-dev] Correct bugs alias for selinux?

[gentoo-dev] Correct bugs alias for selinux?

[Ciaran McCreesh]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 773 bytes --]

What's the correct bugzilla alias for selinux things? I've been told
that selinux@ is a black hole (despite being a valid bugzilla account),
and from the looks of things hardened@ aren't interested (although
herds.xml seems to suggest that selinux is part of hardened).

For reference, I need someone with selinux knowledge to check out bug
61961 (new vixie-cron). I've forward ported the selinux patch so that it
at least applies, but I can't test whether it compiles, let alone works.
I'd like to get this out of package.mask sometime soon, and I'd really
rather not screw things up for our ~arch selinux user...

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Sparc, MIPS, Vim, Fluxbox)
Mail            : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web             : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm


[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Correct bugs alias for selinux?

[Joshua Brindle]

Ciaran McCreesh wrote:

>What's the correct bugzilla alias for selinux things? I've been told
>that selinux@ is a black hole (despite being a valid bugzilla account),
>and from the looks of things hardened@ aren't interested (although
>herds.xml seems to suggest that selinux is part of hardened).
>
>  
>
interesting, selinux@ is suppose to work but I can't find it on toucan, 
any infra help?

>For reference, I need someone with selinux knowledge to check out bug
>61961 (new vixie-cron). I've forward ported the selinux patch so that it
>at least applies, but I can't test whether it compiles, let alone works.
>I'd like to get this out of package.mask sometime soon, and I'd really
>rather not screw things up for our ~arch selinux user...
>  
>
pebenito and I are both on hardened@ and i know pebenito has seen that 
bug, we talked about it but I don't know the status from there.


Joshua

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Correct bugs alias for selinux?

[Lisa Seelye]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 647 bytes --]

On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 11:34, Joshua Brindle wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> 
> >What's the correct bugzilla alias for selinux things? I've been told
> >that selinux@ is a black hole (despite being a valid bugzilla account),
> >and from the looks of things hardened@ aren't interested (although
> >herds.xml seems to suggest that selinux is part of hardened).
> >
> >  
> >
> interesting, selinux@ is suppose to work but I can't find it on toucan, 
> any infra help?

I think now is a good time to plug
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lisa/aliases.html
-- 
Regards,
-Lisa
<Vix ulla tam iniqua pax, quin bello vel aequissimo sit potior>

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Correct bugs alias for selinux?

[Joshua Brindle]

Lisa Seelye wrote:

>On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 11:34, Joshua Brindle wrote:
>  
>
>>Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>What's the correct bugzilla alias for selinux things? I've been told
>>>that selinux@ is a black hole (despite being a valid bugzilla account),
>>>and from the looks of things hardened@ aren't interested (although
>>>herds.xml seems to suggest that selinux is part of hardened).
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>interesting, selinux@ is suppose to work but I can't find it on toucan, 
>>any infra help?
>>    
>>
>
>I think now is a good time to plug
>http://dev.gentoo.org/~lisa/aliases.html
>  
>
how did you get that list?

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Correct bugs alias for selinux?

[Lisa Seelye]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 359 bytes --]

On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 12:14, Joshua Brindle wrote:
> Lisa Seelye wrote:
> >I think now is a good time to plug
> >http://dev.gentoo.org/~lisa/aliases.html
> >  
> >
> how did you get that list?

Source is at http://dev.gentoo.org/~lisa/bin/aliases.pl

-- 
Regards,
Lisa Seelye
Key fingerprint = 09CF 52D6 B82B 72B9 97A7  601B CB46 B556 1E49 6FC5

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Correct bugs alias for selinux?

[Joshua Brindle]

Lisa Seelye wrote:

>On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 12:14, Joshua Brindle wrote:
>  
>
>>Lisa Seelye wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>I think now is a good time to plug
>>>http://dev.gentoo.org/~lisa/aliases.html
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>how did you get that list?
>>    
>>
>
>Source is at http://dev.gentoo.org/~lisa/bin/aliases.pl
>
>  
>
yea but us lesser devs don't have access to read the directory contents 
of the alias dirs

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Correct bugs alias for selinux?

[Lisa Seelye]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 354 bytes --]

On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 12:21, Joshua Brindle wrote:
> yea but us lesser devs don't have access to read the directory contents 
> of the alias dirs

You can still ls inside the alias directory though.  And you do have
read privvies on the alias files.
-- 
Regards,
Lisa Seelye
Key fingerprint = 09CF 52D6 B82B 72B9 97A7  601B CB46 B556 1E49 6FC5

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Correct bugs alias for selinux?

[Stuart Herbert]

On Sunday 29 August 2004 17:28, Lisa Seelye wrote:
> You can still ls inside the alias directory though.  And you do have
> read privvies on the alias files.

We have write access too.

Best regards,
Stu
-- 
Stuart Herbert                                              stuart@gentoo.org
Gentoo Developer                                       http://www.gentoo.org/
                                                   http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/

GnuPG key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu
Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319  C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C
--

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Correct bugs alias for selinux?

[Paul de Vrieze]

On Sunday 29 August 2004 22:10, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> On Sunday 29 August 2004 17:28, Lisa Seelye wrote:
> > You can still ls inside the alias directory though.  And you do have
> > read privvies on the alias files.
>
> We have write access too.

Only to the files, but we cannot just add a file.

Paul

-- 
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list