public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Matthew Walker" <mwalker@kydance.net>
To: <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo &quot;stable&quot; going in wrong direction ?
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:46:01 -0700 (MST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4132.216.190.203.130.1040071561.squirrel@squirrelmail.kydance.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.50.0212161537410.22911-100000@cerberus.localhost>

Jon Portnoy said:
>
> On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Maik Schreiber wrote:
>
> [snip]
>>
>> So again, there's no point in masking a package "unstable" just because
>> its dependencies are "unstable".
>>
>> --
>> Maik Schreiber, Gentoo Linux Developer
>> http://www.gentoo.org
>> mailto:blizzy@gentoo.org
>>
>> --
>> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
>>
>
>
> Er? If the dependencies are marked unstable and the package isn't, nobody
> (or nobody only using stable keywords, I should say) can install it unless
>  the dependencies are marked stable...
>

True. But as soon as the dependencies get marked stable, they /will/ be able
to install it.

Also, in this case, the unstable dependency was purely an optional dependency.

> --
> Jon Portnoy
>
>
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list




--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-12-16 20:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-12-15 12:56 [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "stable" going in wrong direction ? Rainer Groesslinger
2002-12-15 18:43 ` Saverio Vigni
2002-12-15 18:03   ` Maik Schreiber
2002-12-16 18:30 ` foser
2002-12-16 20:34   ` Maik Schreiber
2002-12-16 20:38     ` Jon Portnoy
2002-12-16 20:43       ` Maik Schreiber
2002-12-16 20:46       ` Matthew Walker [this message]
2002-12-16 20:50         ` [gentoo-dev] Gentoo &quot;stable&quot; " Maik Schreiber
2002-12-16 20:50     ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "stable" " Martin Schlemmer
2002-12-16 21:04       ` Maik Schreiber
2002-12-16 21:05         ` Martin Schlemmer
2002-12-17  1:05     ` foser
2002-12-17  0:26       ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo &quot;stable&quot; " Matthew Walker
2002-12-17  1:47         ` foser
2002-12-17  0:56           ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo &amp;quot;stable&amp;quot; " Matthew Walker
2002-12-17 10:25       ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "stable" " Maik Schreiber
2002-12-17 14:12         ` foser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4132.216.190.203.130.1040071561.squirrel@squirrelmail.kydance.net \
    --to=mwalker@kydance.net \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox