public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Travis Tilley <lv@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Two requests for ebuild maintainers+writers
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:51:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <412F6692.5070300@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200408271555.09772.pauldv@gentoo.org>

Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 August 2004 21:43, Travis Tilley wrote:
> 
>>I have two requests that will help to make my work incredibly easy. ;)
>>
>>1) start using $(get_libdir) wherever possible instead of referencing
>>lib directly. get_libdir is now part of the eutils eclass and is used by
>>gen_usr_ldscript in eutils. so, where previously it had:
> 
> 
> One question abou this. Currently java archives are instaled in /usr/lib. They 
> are obviously architecture independent. Should we still use $(get_libdir) for 
> those, or is there maybe an independent dir.
> 
> Paul
> 
> ps. As a sidenote, wouldn't it be better to also make the /usr part dynamic? 
> That makes package relocation fairly easy.


java is going to be stress if we have to support both a 64bit and 32bit 
jre... especially since azureus needs a 64bit SWT to work and such. i'd 
say that java stuff should probably not use $(get_libdir), or (almost) 
anything that ends up in /opt. that is, indeed, a good question that i 
hadnt thought of.

the chunk of the FHS that mentions lib64 notes that 64bit libraries 
should go there... so if it isnt a library and lives in lib, you might 
also not want to use $(get_libdir)... but that would all depend on how 
jstubbs eventually implements multilib dependency handling in portage, 
so it might just be safer to use $(get_libdir) even then to prevent file 
collisions. at the very least, it shouldnt cause problems on 
non-multilib systems since "$(get_libdir)" will always equal "lib" on 
them, and you dont have to worry about collisions. ;p

*pokes jstubbs*


Travis Tilley <lv@gentoo.org>

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-27 16:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-25 19:43 [gentoo-dev] Two requests for ebuild maintainers+writers Travis Tilley
2004-08-27 13:55 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-08-27 16:51   ` Travis Tilley [this message]
2004-08-27 21:43     ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-09-02 23:33 ` Andrej Kacian
2004-09-03 13:43   ` Travis Tilley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=412F6692.5070300@gentoo.org \
    --to=lv@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    --cc=jstubbs@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox