From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12004 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2004 00:31:31 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 26 Aug 2004 00:31:31 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C08At-0005TC-4g for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 00:31:31 +0000 Received: (qmail 25937 invoked by uid 89); 26 Aug 2004 00:31:30 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 17055 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2004 00:31:30 +0000 Message-ID: <412D2F5F.2090109@ifm.liu.se> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 02:31:27 +0200 From: Anton Starikov User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040824) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <412CF14E.7040106@ifm.liu.se> <1093465509.25119.4.camel@localhost> <1093465700.25119.6.camel@localhost> <412D03F6.4050604@ifm.liu.se> <1093474769.31933.2.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1093474769.31933.2.camel@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.85.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-eltn-site-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the administrator, tel. 2826, for more information X-eltn-site-MailScanner: Found to be clean Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ifc USE flag, fortran support and some general notes about multi-compiler support X-Archives-Salt: b1a3c6a2-9a20-431e-85eb-a20257a2c14f X-Archives-Hash: 078dbd909988c10d7d5a450aa7852079 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > USE flags are for features _within_ packages, not for things you do _to_ > the package. Choosing a toolchain shouldn't be done with USE flags. > That's what gcc-config is for. You seem to be rejecting it out of hand > rather than considering an expansion of its functionality. For example, > it could read a file to switch compilers in a package-dependent way. Yes, complitely agree. This way reqiure to make some changes to portage system. If someone want to implement it. But this way of course much better. Here I agree for 100%. I just use USE flags as some kind of quasi sollution for now. Without changing something in portage. Of course if it will be accepted, it is much better to implement it into more clean way. Anton. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list