From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,DMARC_NONE, INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,NUMERIC_HTTP_ADDR, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from ext-ch1gw-2.online-age.net ([216.34.191.36]) by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1) id 15ND9e-0002u1-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 06:43:46 -0600 Received: from int-ch1gw-1.online-age.net (int-ch1gw-1 [3.159.232.65]) by ext-ch1gw-2.online-age.net (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1/990426-RLH) with ESMTP id IAA28922 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 08:43:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from uswaumsxbhmedge.med.ge.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by int-ch1gw-1.online-age.net (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1/990426-RLH) with ESMTP id IAA10496 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 08:43:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: by amermsx.med.ge.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 07:43:26 -0500 Message-ID: <411301487662D411ADDB0090274F3A7502260AF8@uswaumsx01medge.med.ge.com> From: "Greer, Darren (MED)" To: "'gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org'" Subject: RE: [gentoo-dev] Re: Problems with initial gentoo rc5 binary inst all - GRUB MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Jul 19 06:44:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 07:43:26 -0500 X-Archives-Salt: 4377c098-548d-4ae1-9266-0c1e2d69bc38 X-Archives-Hash: d8b4334ececca6aec2b6b21389247b4c Well, that explains it. Thanks for the info. Unfortunately, GE has /very/ strict rules, and there will be no way I can get 22 open. I don't suppose there is a feature request area where I can suggest the option of grabbing these things on port 80 :P ? Otherwise, I guess I live with the CD for now. Thanks, Darren -----Original Message----- From: Jerry A! [mailto:jerry@thehutt.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 5:46 PM To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Problems with initial gentoo rc5 binary inst all - GRUB On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 04:48:35PM -0500, Greer, Darren (MED) wrote: : Yah, this rsync issue seems like it may be a pain. With Debian I could : easily apt-get update using the proxy. However, when I set the proxy in : make.globals or using the env rsync_proxy it still does not work. If I : strace it I get: : : Here is proof that I can get out via port 80 from the shell : ####################### : flash /root > export http_proxy=http://3.231.200.25:80 : flash /root > export rsync_proxy=3.231.200.25:80 : flash /root > export http_proxy=3.231.200.25 : flash /root > wget http://gentoo.org I think I see some of your problems. First, RSYNC_PROXY (and since it's in the environment it's all caps) only specifies a rsync server to proxy with. However, rsync_proxy connections only work on port 873. Otherwise, rsync will use rsh/ssh to grab it's data. Now both of those work on port 22. It just dawned on me that in a previous e-mail you mentioned that you only had ports 21 and 80 open. Well, there's your problem--you only have ftp and http open on your firewall. You'll need to either open up port 22 (ssh/rsh) or put in some stateful rules to keep an outgoing connection open. Hope this helps... --Jerry name: Jerry Alexandratos || Open-Source software isn't a phone: 703.599.6023 || matter of life or death... email: jerry@thehutt.org || ...It's much more important || than that! _______________________________________________ gentoo-dev mailing list gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org http://cvs.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev