From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30210 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2004 13:13:00 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 29 Jul 2004 13:13:00 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BqAiR-0003wH-4A for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:12:59 +0000 Received: (qmail 22287 invoked by uid 89); 29 Jul 2004 13:12:58 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 12887 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2004 13:12:58 +0000 Message-ID: <4108F79B.20903@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:11:55 -0500 From: Lance Albertson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (Windows/20040707) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Aaron Walker , gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <200407271254.50020.absinthe@gentoo.org> <20040727194940.GG24932@mail.lieber.org> <4106B2C6.3030505@gentoo.org> <4108A16D.9090508@butsugenjitemple.org> <4108ECA5.1020102@gentoo.org> <4108F3A5.1000505@butsugenjitemple.org> In-Reply-To: <4108F3A5.1000505@butsugenjitemple.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig1BC92F9DA213EFBF55F69CFC" Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Bug voting X-Archives-Salt: 37b57cd9-a8ef-486a-baf6-6bcc467ca7bc X-Archives-Hash: 6d6468197704a495e8f4d44d62950ade --------------enig1BC92F9DA213EFBF55F69CFC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Aaron Walker wrote: > Lance Albertson wrote: > >> Aaron Walker wrote: >> >> >>> Well, there is supposed to be a "Bug Writing Guidelines" which is linked >>> to by the main Bugzilla page. It is however, atm, unavailable (404). I >>> filed a bug on this a week or two ago >>> (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57282). >> >> >> >> Thanks for pointing that out. I commented on above bug, see what you >> think! [snip] > Just CC'd myself on that bug. I agree that more bugzilla documentation > would be better. It would reduce flawed bug reports to an extent. Of > course, there will always be the few that don't read... I meant to post this for the list too, but with regard to lack of documentation for users about our bugzilla, I created a bug [1] to track progress of it. If any of you would like to contribute, please feel free! [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58651 -- Lance Albertson Gentoo Infrastructure --- Public GPG key: Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net --------------enig1BC92F9DA213EFBF55F69CFC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) iD8DBQFBCPedQW+hXSf0t0IRAgysAJ47vPJ0camx/Bf+fY50jndTD8kUtgCfXn1B JbbI07GXXAp5K/9Fcxfgvts= =N+Dw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig1BC92F9DA213EFBF55F69CFC--