From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25729 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2004 18:42:46 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 27 Jul 2004 18:42:46 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BpWuP-0000rr-2I for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:42:41 +0000 Received: (qmail 1037 invoked by uid 89); 27 Jul 2004 18:42:40 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 17554 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2004 18:42:40 +0000 Message-ID: <4106A1E3.7000904@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:41:39 -0500 From: Lance Albertson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (Windows/20040707) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: wolf31o2@gentoo.org CC: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <200407271254.50020.absinthe@gentoo.org> <20040727180443.4db0015c@snowdrop.home> <200407271327.29517.absinthe@gentoo.org> <20040727173952.GC13649@gonzo.stern.nyu.edu> <1090950859.29438.54.camel@montreal> <1090952437.9149.54.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1090952437.9149.54.camel@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD0E71A0AD126DE8068B957BA" Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Bug voting X-Archives-Salt: 3ce868aa-2c3a-4ab6-8765-29441e7672fc X-Archives-Hash: 0dbcfaa3d4ff870d62e595ae5f2356a0 --------------enigD0E71A0AD126DE8068B957BA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Chris Gianelloni wrote: > What we will see is voting on lots of feature enhancements, which is > good, as it will give us a clue on what our users want from us. What we > won't see is much voting on bugs that are actual bugs. At least, not on > the ones we can actually fix. When I spend time working on Gentoo, any > enhancements *always* take back seat to actual bugs, and always will no > matter how high they get "voted" simply because we should solve the > problems with things we're already supporting, before adding more > potential problems to the mix. I should note that infrastructure is working on a survey system so we can get more feedback from our users on features/etc. Not sure how this can be tied to this bug voting thread, but I thought I'd at least let this be known. Its still being worked on atm, but its in the works for the long run at least. -- Lance Albertson Gentoo Infrastructure --- Public GPG key: Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net --------------enigD0E71A0AD126DE8068B957BA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) iD8DBQFBBqHlQW+hXSf0t0IRAoXwAJ45SZV2HIw2OSkUQW4MhL5VKmwGqACgpWLy OWtVXJWPq11pj46F+pDFwSM= =Ovl6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD0E71A0AD126DE8068B957BA--