public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Rhinelander <jason@gossamer-threads.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Bug voting
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:59:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41069808.7040405@gossamer-threads.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040727173952.GC13649@gonzo.stern.nyu.edu>

Peter Johanson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 01:27:29PM -0400, Dylan Carlson wrote:
> 
>>On Tuesday 27 July 2004 1:04 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>>
>>>Well, given that most of our users don't seem to be able to get the
>>>priority field straight ("Waah! There's a tiny typo in an einfo
>>>statement! BLOCKER!"), I'd be kind of sceptical about an easily rigged
>>>popularity contest. I suspect we'd just end up seeing thousands of votes
>>>for "add more pictures to bootsplash" and "add this horribly broken
>>>kernel patch to g-d-s"...
>>
>>That's a grim assessment.  In any case, it doesn't matter how someone 
>>spends their votes.  If many people spend votes for bootsplash, and 
>>bootsplash enhancements end up being a priority, then I would hope we 
>>would respond by incorporating them with the same priority as our own 
>>personal wishlists.
> 
> 
> I think the point (once you learn to decode ciaranm's acidic comments)
> is that this voting may result in a group of overly zealous users
> skewing things away from realistic priorities. We might see a bug about
> reiser4 support in g-d-s  get pumped up to the top of the list, where a
> bug about fixing a major but subtle flaw in base-layout might not get
> any attention. (just an example (one that ciaranm will i'm sure enjoy))
> 

Is that really a problem though?  Just because more people voted for A 
than B doesn't mean that the dev who chooses between the two has to do A 
- it simply provides a mode of input as to how many users want the 
feature.  When a dev knows that B is probably more important, he really 
isn't going to care that A got more votes - the voting only becomes a 
determining factor when similar ideas are considered.

On the other hand, there may well be many people who feel that votes == 
importance, and I think it ought to be made clear that this simply isn't 
the case - votes would serve as a way for people to say "me too" without 
actually cluttering up the bug report by typing "me too" into the 
comment box.

-- Jason Rhinelander
-- Gossamer Threads, Inc.

> None the less, i think enabling it warrants consideration.
> 
> -pete

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-07-27 17:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-27 16:54 [gentoo-dev] Bug voting Dylan Carlson
2004-07-27 17:04 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-27 17:21   ` Chris Bainbridge
2004-07-27 17:27   ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-27 17:39     ` Peter Johanson
2004-07-27 17:54       ` Olivier Crete
2004-07-27 18:20         ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-07-27 18:41           ` Lance Albertson
2004-07-27 17:59       ` Jason Rhinelander [this message]
2004-07-27 19:31         ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2004-07-27 18:07     ` [gentoo-dev] " Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-27 18:18       ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-27 18:45         ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-27 19:26           ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-27 20:09             ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-27 20:23               ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-07-27 20:29               ` Spider
2004-07-27 20:37               ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-27 21:39                 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-27 22:24                   ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-27 22:59                     ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-27 23:12                       ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-28  7:06                         ` Tom Wesley
2004-07-27 22:49                   ` Tommi Pirinen
2004-07-27 23:07                     ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-27 23:46                       ` Tommi Pirinen
2004-07-28  6:55                         ` Tom Wesley
2004-07-28  7:52                           ` Georgi Georgiev
2004-07-27 23:26                     ` [gentoo-dev] " Gabriel Ebner
2004-07-27 23:41                     ` Gabriel Ebner
2004-07-27 23:48                     ` Gabriel Ebner
2004-07-27 23:52                     ` Gabriel Ebner
2004-07-28  0:02                       ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-28  0:08                         ` Mike Frysinger
2004-07-28  0:10                         ` Gabriel Ebner
2004-07-28  0:08                       ` Jon Portnoy
2004-07-28  0:14                         ` Gabriel Ebner
2004-07-28  0:09                       ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-28  0:21                         ` Gabriel Ebner
2004-07-28  0:30                           ` Gabriel Ebner
2004-07-27 21:06               ` [gentoo-dev] " David Sparks
2004-07-27 23:01             ` Stephen P. Becker
2004-07-28  3:48             ` Kumba
2004-07-27 19:49 ` Kurt Lieber
2004-07-27 19:53   ` Lance Albertson
     [not found]     ` <4108A16D.9090508@butsugenjitemple.org>
     [not found]       ` <4108ECA5.1020102@gentoo.org>
     [not found]         ` <4108F3A5.1000505@butsugenjitemple.org>
2004-07-29 13:11           ` Lance Albertson
2004-07-29 15:14             ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2004-07-29 17:50               ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-30  2:41                 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-30  4:00                   ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-30 11:05                   ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2004-08-06 10:09   ` [gentoo-dev] " Paul de Vrieze
2004-07-27 20:09 ` [gentoo-dev] Bug voting++ Frank van de Pol
2004-07-27 21:09   ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-28  0:26 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Bug voting Joel Konkle-Parker
2004-07-28  2:53 ` [gentoo-dev] " Mike Gardiner
2004-07-28  3:11   ` Robin H. Johnson
2004-07-28  6:55     ` Tom Wesley
2004-07-28 14:12     ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-28 23:58       ` [gentoo-dev] " Joel Konkle-Parker
2004-07-29  0:38         ` Dylan Carlson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-27 18:17 [gentoo-dev] " Brian Harring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41069808.7040405@gossamer-threads.com \
    --to=jason@gossamer-threads.com \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox