From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06335138334 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 12:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 02A88E07F2; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 12:32:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4BFCE07D7 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 12:32:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-98-218-46-55.hsd1.md.comcast.net [98.218.46.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mjo) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77423349BCD for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 12:32:22 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] acct-user.eclass: handle missing path in preinst To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20190814211400.58175-1-floppym@gentoo.org> <15ee5b1e-a171-c530-3973-ac5ca5a98a04@gentoo.org> From: Michael Orlitzky Message-ID: <3e9add50-346a-0dd7-99d3-ea0fb5d2b1df@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 08:32:07 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 66a5852d-e8a1-44fd-afd1-15ca9644dbb1 X-Archives-Hash: 602370ba3b07d2082263031357b61135 On 8/14/19 5:41 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > (If the "man" user really reads things from e.g. $HOME/man5/ebuild.5, > I'll eat my foot.) > > > Agreed. Please file a bug about this. > We already have bug 691478 for this issue? Only it should have been assigned to the failing package's project instead of the eclass maintainer: it's a build failure in a package that's doing something it shouldn't be doing. Revbump acct-user/man and it's fixed.