From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D302138330 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 20:41:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BB46BE0C8D; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 20:41:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F1CCE0C43 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 20:41:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-98-218-46-55.hsd1.md.comcast.net [98.218.46.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mjo) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D25BC341024 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 20:41:05 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] toolchain-funcs.eclass: Add tc-check-openmp() function To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1476390907.19719.10.camel@gentoo.org> From: Michael Orlitzky Message-ID: <3e23a31a-2feb-38f8-7247-bd55cbad731d@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 16:40:59 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1476390907.19719.10.camel@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: b9e7edd8-dd9a-4461-85ca-cbfaa40088fd X-Archives-Hash: 7d237f73cd731dabfd8f467377947b64 On 10/13/2016 04:35 PM, David Seifert wrote: > + ewarn "Your current compiler does not support OpenMP" > + > + ... > + > + die "Active compiler does not have required support Hey, a message that isn't about comrel. Since you're going to die(), isn't eerror more accurate than ewarn?