From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-34533-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1Lc1au-0004p9-01
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:01:24 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C2C1FE0618;
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:01:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-fx0-f161.google.com (mail-fx0-f161.google.com [209.85.220.161])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8787CE0618
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:01:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so2902154fxm.10
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:01:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to
:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=/TnShcr51APrAB24d0T3/hMKdaSMij40V4u4RIbBYmY=;
b=bkAMdnRKJIsbsXyXxvFHowQXW3nOTFGYUgaI8Hc+0xpImTY/lKxlJJLtCixIh/AIxD
cS4Ko+rJUwavrVTwe42w4UCVMKQIhQo/qA/PzwMkFFxOmSngKrcLDuecdp6ix9zRWnQQ
eiux+9E6RHUShPV9dkC1hsDIroUbLRrV3wvgY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
b=sNdqi2j23KkSnTZvYjSCEwxiHS+O20DVrkUCEphLLlLk6HzaA5qwQYGRzlsfH3F4EE
7I6FZA9L3XYZv1XVkcKXnh/720K4rZIm+waHbfn9j99/JWFmDFj4/SonZty+DxV5t1GB
jfSUHkY5NT+4mD76kFxOXVGBuaULTbsvUavV8=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: cooldwind@gmail.com
Received: by 10.223.105.140 with SMTP id t12mr18785fao.12.1235498477574; Tue,
24 Feb 2009 10:01:17 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20090224174725.GC3506@hrair>
References: <20090223072648.GK12339@hermes> <20090224174725.GC3506@hrair>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:01:17 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: e54223a088c07d35
Message-ID: <3c32af40902241001k52b7be0csbe817bdbe4d23738@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for February 26
From: "Santiago M. Mola" <coldwind@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: zmedico@gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 99bfe526-eec3-4ddf-96e5-8bc4edeaf829
X-Archives-Hash: 32f9206b2bcefa1d5e718ecb3fcef01c
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Brian Harring <ferringb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> At the very least I'm after having the non-pms repos marked in some
> fashion so that alt implementations don't have to assume the portage
> standard (rather then the *agreed to* pms standard) to avoid
> exploding, but that's a rather short sighted solution- something is
> needed long term.
>
And/or make Portage noisy on PMS violations.
Regards,
--
Santiago M. Mola
Jabber ID: cooldwind@gmail.com