From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-34040-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1LOwq6-0004y8-GT
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:19:02 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 70FC5E04D7;
Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:18:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-fx0-f20.google.com (mail-fx0-f20.google.com [209.85.220.20])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DFA1E04D7
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:18:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fxm13 with SMTP id 13so539877fxm.10
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:18:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender
:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references
:x-google-sender-auth;
bh=kIkRZXjwXWlE261eCls5AoHXIXLheaZaaxIxkpNwmcs=;
b=mREN53WkpgKFL0VOulrM9vlRIKoEWoKC0WXTS7K58ep3aicv2aSBE+cN83OHnUD4Hr
2L4MZBJUUfQc+P8/YW3A64ThMZvfzrurBdE26AlQJ+xt9vpwQTqUfCabrchmhZUedW06
DP0c8huJP+ixW6pjSviU+H0vPg/7s/awFEVwo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
:references:x-google-sender-auth;
b=dgACCkaTbHAkewi2TGARhJl1Hj2ehw9N+ykIJVWa4PWqfaUC54mlrje7eGNltGMpq9
wkoe8UZx32RUwQP+kQ3PElESCVAbiUKyFl8DV2ri/P6ZfenyK/+Rno0CrCIZWjcf0c+p
aKRdgNTcY8+UTHRCT4ZZf2ggV11O2+8SBGMVU=
Received: by 10.181.138.13 with SMTP id q13mr2128648bkn.42.1232381933390;
Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:18:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.181.151.10 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:18:53 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <3c32af40901190818x14704285qbbdc6daa81c432f7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:18:53 +0100
From: "Santiago M. Mola" <coldwind@gentoo.org>
Sender: cooldwind@gmail.com
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Detecting Baselayout2/openrc - no-symlink profiles leading to breakage
In-Reply-To: <49726F21.8010004@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20090117230733.GV7944@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net>
<49726F21.8010004@gentoo.org>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 50621d2e07b0a1d2
X-Archives-Salt: f6771db3-1a20-40a8-acad-471e45b2ae55
X-Archives-Hash: 12e20b8715c9b379eb99fa41a2ff09ae
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:52 AM, Friedrich Oslage <bluebird@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> Why not teach /sbin/runscript it's own version? With something like this
> we could also do stuff depending on a specific version of openrc:
>
That would be a good solution since it'll allow us to check higher
versions for new features. Otherwise, it's very likely that we need to
solve the same problem again in the near future.
Regards,
--
Santiago M. Mola
Jabber ID: cooldwind@gmail.com