From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KIJuO-0004Wg-CN for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 08:59:48 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B0A77E0483; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 08:59:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.241]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EEB1E0483 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 08:59:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c28so922643ana.47 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 01:59:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=JZadZpdxM22+zQ050QwWbSSL9AgEaog9lGgyK/+ggGQ=; b=pywXhxBXLr9yXefJ1AiO4e1uZT8nDAYCwj7xRaOhD+7HMyTHeaYQ9hNe5li2yCPcXb uFlQSzvXpoMqsKqjXb4rObdjYSFbGsIWFfGZAig/qUed0EZV2/yjN7JoXV2TrrzZ0gWj AdAiJDioke+ngOjCKaDx46LV4Hwrh43WXBHa4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=BbEXSpcCVeyyTKfuELc3mFsfneXAVeevTgXxn9XT+ijRgWDAURpdKnHrz6tnl0wqs1 hMXwwHIoGJ5Bx+s0TiNNZWFMQh7+W8XW8iWB4A6yVQIOM2Qk8FqOlXu7AAZl+/sZpiqz TbNS4CkgqMWt4xmKte6dR2EP+02cDfJxd6DDE= Received: by 10.100.172.17 with SMTP id u17mr9753578ane.28.1216025986220; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 01:59:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.231.13 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 01:59:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3c32af40807140159g6c53ca94mca5720039ddbca05@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 10:59:46 +0200 From: "Santiago M. Mola" Sender: cooldwind@gmail.com To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting summary for 10 July 2008 In-Reply-To: <20080714053258.44ba9a59@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080713071118.GC1891@comet> <20080713235255.0e2b7f8e@googlemail.com> <20080714002117.731f1408@googlemail.com> <20080714004306.727d20df@googlemail.com> <20080714031344.3c629b2c@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> <20080714022235.2cfb0a2c@googlemail.com> <20080714053258.44ba9a59@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> X-Google-Sender-Auth: c98c46fbfa525a30 X-Archives-Salt: 01cadb38-a844-4f75-bdfe-436de7d85270 X-Archives-Hash: 71fdf0431b7462fcd03c829b1661a832 On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 5:32 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > > What GLEP 55 fails to address right now is the very development process > it is seemingly supposed to alleviate. It addresses the issue of EAPI > implementation from the viewpoint of the package manager's developer, > but it doesn't begin to address the viewpoint of the package > maintainer or architecture developer at all. It looks to me like a lot > of problems are moved out of the package manager(s) and into this > already huge tree of files, with different EAPI-suffixed files > addressing different problems, and that indicate be a non-trivial > increase in the number of files in the tree - files which would > address the equal purpose of installing exactly one =cat/pkg-ver. GLEP 55 says: "Note that it is still not permitted to have more than one ebuild with equal category, package name, and version." > In other words, disregarding its other real world deficiencies like an > immediate goal, GLEP 55 fails to describe a keywording policy for > architecture developers Keywording policy wouldn't change. Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: cooldwind@gmail.com -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list