From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-30624-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1JuBca-0007FL-TU
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 08 May 2008 19:17:42 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ACC6CE0609;
Thu, 8 May 2008 19:17:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.239])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F6F1E0609
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 8 May 2008 19:17:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c48so461253wra.1
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 08 May 2008 12:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
bh=7XUPEH01BZW+m6R88tZNu6SwXELzhjtpIKu5oYsaBOQ=;
b=JFs4+44XT7ctJbyRaAKtGLvpoq/0Eq0jVgU3QQACnR3t3wrCx9Gp15nWZ42l0FCNTx/8VVJg2I2m/y8ltmnPxFS7n9+gG5WpYngVneMd7fHk51xvrO9B0dmgwd4r0grmqNLoh6pQeFhqcDm9eWO3dvqA46kKD+cgojeDh9KSjfw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
b=nALdsRPcathUolzfMMZw3He3BzlRBd9Z4uQpkj8w1fv0wfEzRUz8zwKU8I/Gn+8X7geOxqRpC9sRRpQDtKDSEMRK4pMNV6wcRmWgRGKK8DWvLtiNjoJmSwQywUEF2qw/JeR6YPbq+DJQbn/YTb8RQTrFvLJo5SuMYj+1x/IXNh4=
Received: by 10.100.141.5 with SMTP id o5mr4884788and.64.1210274252000;
Thu, 08 May 2008 12:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.6.14 with HTTP; Thu, 8 May 2008 12:17:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <3c32af40805081217m42bf6e0fl1e2aeecf469f4bbe@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 21:17:31 +0200
From: "Santiago M. Mola" <coldwind@gentoo.org>
Sender: cooldwind@gmail.com
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: lzma tarball usage
In-Reply-To: <20080508190907.GL16108@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <1210166592.19574.10.camel@localhost>
<20080507133430.GI15536@gentoo.org>
<1210272301.26658.6.camel@localhost>
<20080508190907.GL16108@gentoo.org>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 77440369458b8c91
X-Archives-Salt: 01762814-75cf-4225-86c7-1e942219c342
X-Archives-Hash: 25a1e8d2cdbc7fc9005b8a115d36df84
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 9:09 PM, Fabian Groffen <grobian@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> > e) It has been suggested the support should have been added with new
> > EAPI instead of local build deps (some of which are missing, for
> > instance in the hand-rolled for-no-reason-whatsoever .tar.lzma format
> > net-tools doesn't have a dep in addition to using lzma for no good
> > reason)
>
> Chill, relax and cool down. Instead, just ask those who decided to
> follow upstream why and if they have even thought about the issues you
> brought up.
>
Note that we're also speaking about downstream lzma archives. Like in
sys-apps/net-tools, where lzma hasn't been adopted even by upstream.
Regards,
--
Santiago M. Mola
Jabber ID: cooldwind@gmail.com
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list