From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JuBca-0007FL-TU for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 08 May 2008 19:17:42 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ACC6CE0609; Thu, 8 May 2008 19:17:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.239]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F6F1E0609 for ; Thu, 8 May 2008 19:17:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c48so461253wra.1 for ; Thu, 08 May 2008 12:17:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=7XUPEH01BZW+m6R88tZNu6SwXELzhjtpIKu5oYsaBOQ=; b=JFs4+44XT7ctJbyRaAKtGLvpoq/0Eq0jVgU3QQACnR3t3wrCx9Gp15nWZ42l0FCNTx/8VVJg2I2m/y8ltmnPxFS7n9+gG5WpYngVneMd7fHk51xvrO9B0dmgwd4r0grmqNLoh6pQeFhqcDm9eWO3dvqA46kKD+cgojeDh9KSjfw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=nALdsRPcathUolzfMMZw3He3BzlRBd9Z4uQpkj8w1fv0wfEzRUz8zwKU8I/Gn+8X7geOxqRpC9sRRpQDtKDSEMRK4pMNV6wcRmWgRGKK8DWvLtiNjoJmSwQywUEF2qw/JeR6YPbq+DJQbn/YTb8RQTrFvLJo5SuMYj+1x/IXNh4= Received: by 10.100.141.5 with SMTP id o5mr4884788and.64.1210274252000; Thu, 08 May 2008 12:17:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.6.14 with HTTP; Thu, 8 May 2008 12:17:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3c32af40805081217m42bf6e0fl1e2aeecf469f4bbe@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 21:17:31 +0200 From: "Santiago M. Mola" Sender: cooldwind@gmail.com To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: lzma tarball usage In-Reply-To: <20080508190907.GL16108@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1210166592.19574.10.camel@localhost> <20080507133430.GI15536@gentoo.org> <1210272301.26658.6.camel@localhost> <20080508190907.GL16108@gentoo.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 77440369458b8c91 X-Archives-Salt: 01762814-75cf-4225-86c7-1e942219c342 X-Archives-Hash: 25a1e8d2cdbc7fc9005b8a115d36df84 On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 9:09 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: > > > e) It has been suggested the support should have been added with new > > EAPI instead of local build deps (some of which are missing, for > > instance in the hand-rolled for-no-reason-whatsoever .tar.lzma format > > net-tools doesn't have a dep in addition to using lzma for no good > > reason) > > Chill, relax and cool down. Instead, just ask those who decided to > follow upstream why and if they have even thought about the issues you > brought up. > Note that we're also speaking about downstream lzma archives. Like in sys-apps/net-tools, where lzma hasn't been adopted even by upstream. Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: cooldwind@gmail.com -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list