From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JnX5x-00018f-89 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 10:48:29 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 745CDE0659; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 10:48:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.251]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D9EE0659 for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 10:48:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c8so352415ana.47 for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 03:48:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=/f1+RPTZEN7o+1vjO+QxSxljqZ+IC38S2QbdVRTqGpA=; b=bU7+Tj+iIhlHfR/1oNPjzGgNv3+uIURz6EVvjpH8IfOicTOIvsevq9rwoOP+Dvlpy1ejoaiLjkswVcE7OoVlPVGrhX4zDhpAZ9ZpINCmpYNL4fXEkUKEg9B/BNdFq56vZPy+JDndmc14Zx8HSP4kDEisGawwqhAX93JAw2q+WGI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=I1AqZRuzfhXQ3wK7iC7P3HxNkQbRZUMRDmLfdgoN3bYorYAX2HKT7c3gSw4HUI22Rw8DOeEgtUX+FkIt7y//SY37IUDctNlzyFYi2/9rPz/8++1Ap/sAtKXuEjC1CvOWnBUnafUTcDZqKnoNsgsLK+6Fu7hMW3pc7QI09rXvwKI= Received: by 10.100.33.11 with SMTP id g11mr6969571ang.2.1208688507112; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 03:48:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.45.17 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 03:48:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3c32af40804200348j1e601f71naf13d48873f33d29@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 12:48:26 +0200 From: "Santiago M. Mola" Sender: cooldwind@gmail.com To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies that're available at pkg_*inst In-Reply-To: <20080420093613.1122a705@snowcone> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080419053116.50e0ffe6@snowcone> <480A1FEE.4020604@gentoo.org> <20080420005728.2d4d2c70@snowcone> <20080420012910.GA8373@seldon.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> <20080420093613.1122a705@snowcone> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2cbcec07564feb9b X-Archives-Salt: 0ccfff21-c5f3-4fce-9032-ab14e80d71af X-Archives-Hash: 16137054eaecca94bb138019cd82aa93 On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:29:10 -0700 > Brian Harring wrote: > > > Stop name dropping labels until you tell folk about what labels are. > > I know, but I'd rather not have the notion "labels solves all" pushed > > forth w/ out people knowing what it is, please. > > Labels are already documented and discussable in the appropriate place. > This is not supposed to be a discussion about future direction. It's > supposed to be about one specific issue regarding how we word things for > current implementations. The two wordings in the original email do not > have equivalent implications, and selecting the correct one affects > whether certain problems are solvable. Let's discuss that, not what > we're going to do six years from now. > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201499 -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: cooldwind@gmail.com -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list