From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JWzuy-0000Dy-JU for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 20:08:48 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E9BABE080C; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 20:07:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.184]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A323EE080C for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 20:07:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so1066650nfh.26 for ; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 12:07:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=xZW/WLyldwP3teN2PcJzkxaJ2+SeU5xnYNjwAbAC/FA=; b=oT8Jc4bPRm/nT29Zk0dT9748AVpZ5nZcn56fhKZSzrGybXS5Dp0P6DEHA06EkyAgGgYNqugWY5/T3PFS3EiAPHVga9iGEzGd7+zAPop1qgrorDUrYw2RBxG2MaJbXftZRzVn5wU7rB7IHduOIVt/rgTZ7LBSctDdylUYZBlRFC0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=dWLDzeN9dHHjcY7TNyE+9H+26q68PSEegwU5LPrHA1qehnPFdDXEzDJfvH/OtmV+EnYRRYIHaloeI8sv5kOtEFj4lHSo19290z5e3vuDxlKaNkvY2dqHJuJPltCGdNPa8M2oGHAbn9CICQHK9CIHURGpX+lPyItvuR+H1WJhvD8= Received: by 10.78.139.14 with SMTP id m14mr7801765hud.76.1204747669112; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 12:07:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.177.17 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 12:07:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3c32af40803051207q314f8809ve6acf69a9936f6b7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 21:07:48 +0100 From: "Santiago M. Mola" Sender: cooldwind@gmail.com To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for March In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080301103002.A2AE266A22@smtp.gentoo.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: d3557d27b5a307ac X-Archives-Salt: bdd494a7-0101-4fb1-860d-be28866a5728 X-Archives-Hash: b946f704746fc7b6ddb4df51518d0b4a On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Anant Narayanan wrote: > Some of you may argue that we already have proxy-maintainers. That's a > great idea, all I'm asking for is for us to formalize the position. > Giving a proxy-maintainer an official acknowledgement will definitely > attract more users to contribute. IMO the problem with proxy-maintainers is that most users don't know such a thing exists. I bet some users could proxy-maintain a lot of orphaned packages if we potentiate proxy-maint. -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: cooldwind@gmail.com -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list