From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J1MpN-0008Gb-GG for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 14:08:17 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lB9E6hTP024578; Sun, 9 Dec 2007 14:06:43 GMT Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.189]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lB9E4dp6022083 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2007 14:04:40 GMT Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so862683nfh for ; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 06:04:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=+VDU6UXXeM7FajYX8MqxFWpePdbdGpjvcv/1j57DoMQ=; b=oMpbUZ6DTAH00sZ6JThIiaLx9ONapXqNjNjDefXaMGPTIe4xjtWt0XwjYncAYrIBhC5K95kqvkLT9wy6Nae58UIFvVfUnKcsmhx1d5pg1E4SDAq99oMdharSEgprOG9YMnPmhY3caeePcjkf5W85fDwua8t2JlLMqEhCzOL7pEk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Ibf+p1Qx/5Gst304+mCmM8tp4+se2y15793moA17Ko0IW4ATZvqQJXG1+HgsKHkZc8HPMDumy/leYp52LSzkEQ8SX/0TROIAFH6vYlH1IUf6sPkAzrj3CqZHHLjFAG4Jm3QdXjM0ewc6YuQKDBWxsR0gg5Y91tmRrMRzP5U3fro= Received: by 10.78.155.4 with SMTP id c4mr5798325hue.1197209078929; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 06:04:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.177.12 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Dec 2007 06:04:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3c32af40712090604w6f5008e3p88f7919e2af159ac@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 15:04:38 +0100 From: "Santiago M. Mola" Sender: cooldwind@gmail.com To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New USE flags documentation In-Reply-To: <4748411B.4040709@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20071124130354.GA8295@gentoo.org> <4748411B.4040709@gentoo.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: dd220ba1baf4be92 X-Archives-Salt: 875965d7-b2d1-4b6d-bb60-c0795cbc0070 X-Archives-Hash: 42e4cd0a24b37178a4d7a7a6592c43eb On Nov 24, 2007 4:19 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote: > Jose Luis Rivero wrote: > > I'm not asking for an extra overhead of 'bureaucracy' (write specs, > > mailling @dev, send to the council, etc.) but a bit more of communication > > would be appreciated: > > > All the above is completely unnecessary and I would be happy to discuss > details with you off list. I'm not against the changes in metadata but I felt a bit angry when the changes were made bypassing established processes and skipping the feedback-rethinking cycle (as other people pointer out... ignoring the community). So, I agree with people asking for freezing the use of the new features until a GLEP is proposed, discussed and approved. Regards, Santiago -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: cooldwind@gmail.com -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list