From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-27887-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1J1MpN-0008Gb-GG
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 14:08:17 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lB9E6hTP024578;
	Sun, 9 Dec 2007 14:06:43 GMT
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.189])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lB9E4dp6022083
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 9 Dec 2007 14:04:40 GMT
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so862683nfh
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 06:04:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        bh=+VDU6UXXeM7FajYX8MqxFWpePdbdGpjvcv/1j57DoMQ=;
        b=oMpbUZ6DTAH00sZ6JThIiaLx9ONapXqNjNjDefXaMGPTIe4xjtWt0XwjYncAYrIBhC5K95kqvkLT9wy6Nae58UIFvVfUnKcsmhx1d5pg1E4SDAq99oMdharSEgprOG9YMnPmhY3caeePcjkf5W85fDwua8t2JlLMqEhCzOL7pEk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=Ibf+p1Qx/5Gst304+mCmM8tp4+se2y15793moA17Ko0IW4ATZvqQJXG1+HgsKHkZc8HPMDumy/leYp52LSzkEQ8SX/0TROIAFH6vYlH1IUf6sPkAzrj3CqZHHLjFAG4Jm3QdXjM0ewc6YuQKDBWxsR0gg5Y91tmRrMRzP5U3fro=
Received: by 10.78.155.4 with SMTP id c4mr5798325hue.1197209078929;
        Sun, 09 Dec 2007 06:04:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.78.177.12 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Dec 2007 06:04:38 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <3c32af40712090604w6f5008e3p88f7919e2af159ac@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 15:04:38 +0100
From: "Santiago M. Mola" <coldwind@gentoo.org>
Sender: cooldwind@gmail.com
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New USE flags documentation
In-Reply-To: <4748411B.4040709@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20071124130354.GA8295@gentoo.org> <4748411B.4040709@gentoo.org>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: dd220ba1baf4be92
X-Archives-Salt: 875965d7-b2d1-4b6d-bb60-c0795cbc0070
X-Archives-Hash: 42e4cd0a24b37178a4d7a7a6592c43eb

On Nov 24, 2007 4:19 PM, Doug Goldstein <cardoe@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Jose Luis Rivero wrote:
> > I'm not asking for an extra overhead of 'bureaucracy' (write specs,
> > mailling @dev, send to the council, etc.) but a bit more of communication
> > would be appreciated:
> >
> All the above is completely unnecessary and I would be happy to discuss
> details with you off list.

I'm not against the changes in metadata but I felt a bit angry when
the changes were made bypassing established processes and skipping the
feedback-rethinking cycle (as other people pointer out... ignoring the
community). So, I agree with people asking for freezing the use of the
new features until a GLEP is proposed, discussed and approved.

Regards,
Santiago

-- 
Santiago M. Mola
Jabber ID: cooldwind@gmail.com
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list