From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-27809-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1Ixp7v-0007yD-1e
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:32:47 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lATJVlsY021599;
Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:31:47 GMT
Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lATJTVRx001326
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:29:32 GMT
Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j3so1934220ugf
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:29:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
bh=Cw18Xa3SSjWkVYwyeKJwnUDJoWp0YMBqxwQ9JfBW/Tw=;
b=uguGvlYBYMQC5bxNoenJIg0Ea7xs4PfCwkklJJQZQeArKe6reU2/P2WYTIYZA6RJUByQyk7VFp1Q0zhiKkIiW/mmRqqFm6uRwlp8Hrd8I/SrbuJRRj7hiugxVOz8RmVWPgO46KhzGHXeza2E4eagbnILfPfaT6Zp9ng49esxoro=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
b=rdtXd2XJoQp9lLt9buKMhetoCcxe0M6fBL4NSYlpbODm+QpGhlvPzfojVrty0p82/deeEjXdkXichPMwVTWHg0Mcz4krOianloZ6J8jAEVfHBLtHFOJQw8TUDQhpU8V5Z9MG/OdL04H8/Tf1wwo+HJPgnXHKQc2uNLuwbneF5xY=
Received: by 10.78.201.10 with SMTP id y10mr1161088huf.1196364571246;
Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:29:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.78.177.11 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:29:31 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <3c32af40711291129m24b886edu24092291efac2281@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:29:31 +0100
From: "Santiago M. Mola" <coldwind@gentoo.org>
Sender: cooldwind@gmail.com
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Features and documentation
In-Reply-To: <pan.2007.11.29.18.06.15@cox.net>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20071127192144.GP4368@supernova> <474D53CA.7060101@gentoo.org>
<pan.2007.11.28.12.38.43@cox.net> <20071128211405.GA11126@supernova>
<20071128213319.09f73e89@blueyonder.co.uk>
<pan.2007.11.29.05.04.19@cox.net> <20071129053854.GD11249@supernova>
<pan.2007.11.29.18.06.15@cox.net>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 390cfbf5d5dcf519
X-Archives-Salt: a588319f-8c7e-4585-942a-66bdd85a3058
X-Archives-Hash: d98399bd54c91e4290ffb2b80b160a66
On Nov 29, 2007 7:06 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote:
>
> Something must have motivated you to present this now. What was it, or
> to put it a different way, how would have things been different in your
> view had this policy been in effect? Point to other examples as well if
> you believe they'll help clarify the effect you intend this policy to
> have.
>
I don't know what kind of changes meant Donnie (I hope he clarify
that) but a couple of examples came to my mind when I read his
proposal: bugs #182253 and #181897. I'm sure there are much better
examples, but those are the ones I have right now.
Regards,
Santiago
--
Santiago M. Mola
Jabber ID: cooldwind@gmail.com
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list