[gentoo-dev] Embedded Gentoo

[gentoo-dev] Embedded Gentoo

[Chris PeBenito]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 768 bytes --]

Due to the renewed interest in Embedded Gentoo, we're looking for some
people that are interested in helping get it restarted.  There are
already a few devs intersted in helping out: solar, sindian, abhishek,
and myself.  The #gentoo-embedded channel has been re-awakened.  Dejan
has already sumbmitted a proposal, but before we start any projects, we
need to do some planning.  Having an IRC meeting seems like a good way
to get the ball rolling.  So if you're interested in helping out, or
have some ideas, let us know.  

-- 
Chris PeBenito
<pebenito@gentoo.org>
Developer, SELinux
Hardened Gentoo Linux
 
Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE6AF9243
Key fingerprint = B0E6 877A 883F A57A 8E6A  CB00 BC8E E42D E6AF 9243

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Embedded Gentoo

[Luke-Jr]

Chris PeBenito wrote:

>So if you're interested in helping out, or
>have some ideas, let us know.  
>  
>
I'm a bit short on time at the moment (hopefully will have more in Dec), 
but I'd be interested in working on this project also if there's any 
small things that I could do...
Is there a list of devices we'd be concentrating on yet? I'd be 
interested in running such a distro on my Zaurus SL-C760. Also, ideas 
for GUIs might be spyderous's <1MB X11 server and Opie. Don't think we 
can fit KDE/GNOME into the 64MB tho ;)


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Embedded Gentoo

[Dejan Nikic]

Well i think the idea was to get it working on "real" embedded software
as oposed to PDAs and concentrate on getting the base system as small as
possible before any other ebuilds are modified for size.  

On Sat, 2003-11-01 at 19:26, Luke-Jr wrote:
> Chris PeBenito wrote:
> 
> >So if you're interested in helping out, or
> >have some ideas, let us know.  
> >  
> >
> I'm a bit short on time at the moment (hopefully will have more in Dec), 
> but I'd be interested in working on this project also if there's any 
> small things that I could do...
> Is there a list of devices we'd be concentrating on yet? I'd be 
> interested in running such a distro on my Zaurus SL-C760. Also, ideas 
> for GUIs might be spyderous's <1MB X11 server and Opie. Don't think we 
> can fit KDE/GNOME into the 64MB tho ;)
> 
> 
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
> 


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Embedded Gentoo

[Donnie Berkholz]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 568 bytes --]

On Sat, 2003-11-01 at 22:26, Luke-Jr wrote:
> Also, ideas 
> for GUIs might be spyderous's <1MB X11 server and Opie. Don't think we 
> can fit KDE/GNOME into the 64MB tho ;)

You can fit a fairly complete installation of kdrive and needed
libraries into ~7MB after deleting a few unneeded servers. However that
isn't in portage right now, just my overlay, which is available on
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/overlay/.

The kdrive in portage currently should also work somehow but is older
and the build is significantly different (imake vs. autotools).

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Embedded Gentoo

[Chris PeBenito]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 983 bytes --]

On Sat, 2003-11-01 at 21:26, Luke-Jr wrote:
> Is there a list of devices we'd be concentrating on yet? I'd be 
> interested in running such a distro on my Zaurus SL-C760. Also, ideas 
> for GUIs might be spyderous's <1MB X11 server and Opie. Don't think we 
> can fit KDE/GNOME into the 64MB tho ;)

Well what we're looking at right now is to see if we can get some people
to work on the project, so it can actually restart.  So after that, we
need to plan project scope, subprojects, etc.  But handhelds would
certainly be in there.  I know sindian and myself would be looking at
that.  I'd probably pick up a zaurus or ipaq.  I'd like to put SELinux
on it. :D  (Before you say boo, the debian/redhat SELinux guy has it on
his ipaq)

-- 
Chris PeBenito
<pebenito@gentoo.org>
Developer, SELinux
Hardened Gentoo Linux
 
Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE6AF9243
Key fingerprint = B0E6 877A 883F A57A 8E6A  CB00 BC8E E42D E6AF 9243

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Embedded Gentoo

[Kevyn Shortell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 993 bytes --]

On Sat, 2003-11-01 at 20:01, Chris PeBenito wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-11-01 at 21:26, Luke-Jr wrote:
> > Is there a list of devices we'd be concentrating on yet? I'd be 
> > interested in running such a distro on my Zaurus SL-C760. Also, ideas 
> > for GUIs might be spyderous's <1MB X11 server and Opie. Don't think we 
> > can fit KDE/GNOME into the 64MB tho ;)
> 
> Well what we're looking at right now is to see if we can get some people
> to work on the project, so it can actually restart.  So after that, we
> need to plan project scope, subprojects, etc.  But handhelds would
> certainly be in there.  I know sindian and myself would be looking at
> that.  I'd probably pick up a zaurus or ipaq.  I'd like to put SELinux
> on it. :D  (Before you say boo, the debian/redhat SELinux guy has it on
> his ipaq)

I've got an ipaq with linux on it, would rather it be gentoo =)
Just need to get me one of the adapters for pcmcia so I can get wireless
to it I suppose!

kevyn

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Embedded Gentoo

[Andrew Gaffney]

Chris PeBenito wrote:
> Due to the renewed interest in Embedded Gentoo, we're looking for some
> people that are interested in helping get it restarted.  There are
> already a few devs intersted in helping out: solar, sindian, abhishek,
> and myself.  The #gentoo-embedded channel has been re-awakened.  Dejan
> has already sumbmitted a proposal, but before we start any projects, we
> need to do some planning.  Having an IRC meeting seems like a good way
> to get the ball rolling.  So if you're interested in helping out, or
> have some ideas, let us know.  

Seemless cross-compiler distcc support in portage.

-- 
Andrew Gaffney


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: Embedded Gentoo

[Michael Kunze]

Chris PeBenito wrote:
> Well what we're looking at right now is to see if we can get some people
> to work on the project, so it can actually restart.  So after that, we
> need to plan project scope, subprojects, etc.  But handhelds would
> certainly be in there.  I know sindian and myself would be looking at
> that.  I'd probably pick up a zaurus or ipaq.  I'd like to put SELinux
> on it. :D  (Before you say boo, the debian/redhat SELinux guy has it on
> his ipaq)

hi,

i'm fairly new here, but monitoring this group for quite some time.
i really would be intersted to get such a project up and running for my
zaurus SL5500G
just to let you know

michael

Put a piece of tape on a cat's foot, you have never laughed so hard!



--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Embedded Gentoo

[david]

On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 01:50:51AM -0600, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> Seemless cross-compiler distcc support in portage.
> 

I second that.  Although seemless cross-compilation would be a good
first step ;-)

what's needed by portage for this type of a thing to work ?  Lots of
re-design ?

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Embedded Gentoo

[Pieter Van den Abeele]

Hiya,

On 03 Nov 2003, at 18:57, david@futuretel.com wrote:

> On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 01:50:51AM -0600, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
>> Seemless cross-compiler distcc support in portage.
>
> I second that.  Although seemless cross-compilation would be a good
> first step ;-)
>
> what's needed by portage for this type of a thing to work ?  Lots of
> re-design ?

For automatic discovery of distributed cross compiling nodes, take a 
look at my zeroconf service lookup/announcement implementation on 
http://dev.gentoo.org/~pvdabeel/.

The idea of zeroconf distributed cross compilation is similar to 
Apple's Xcode implementation:

When somebody announces a service, zeroconf A, SRV, TXT and PTR DNS 
records are created:

The A record contains the IP addres on which the service is available.
The SRV record contains the PORT on which the service is available.
The TXT record contains additional info about the service in a hashmap: 
Apple Xcode for instance encodes the gcc version, the Os version, ... 
(screenshot on http://dev.gentoo.org/~pvdabeel/xcode.jpg)
A PTR record announces a service by a unique name, using that unique 
name A,SRV and TXT can be looked up.

A lookup is basically a retrieval of PTR records for a given category. 
(for instance: _http._tcp.local. gives all http tcp services, 
_distcc._tcp.local. returns the different tcp distcc services on the 
local net).
My tool also allows one to announce your Linux webserver using zeroconf 
etc (http://dev.gentoo.org/~pvdabeel/browser.jpg) and discover those in 
your Zeroconf compatible browser.
If you want to experiment with the tools, please read their usage(). 
Those should contain enough examples. Some fun stuff:

Lookup _http._tcp.local. pointers on a university network with lots of 
Zeroconf printers/machines available:

root@research ZeroConf # ./lookup 12 _http._tcp.local.
PTR _http._tcp.local. to HP LaserJet 4100 Series 
(0001E67C7BFC)._http._tcp.local.
PTR _http._tcp.local. to Wnt CEGE._http._tcp.local.
PTR _http._tcp.local. to HP LaserJet 2200 
(0001E69C3074)._http._tcp.local.
PTR _http._tcp.local. to hp LaserJet 2300 series 
(0001E6A194BB)._http._tcp.local.
PTR _http._tcp.local. to HP LaserJet 3330 
(0001E6918AB2)._http._tcp.local.
PTR _http._tcp.local. to hp LaserJet 2300 series 
(0001E6A6E82B)._http._tcp.local.
PTR _http._tcp.local. to hp LaserJet 2300 series 
(0001E6A1B6D8)._http._tcp.local.

Typical usage:

Announcing a service:

root@research ZeroConf # ./announce 'pvdabeel' 134.184.65.92 1234 'This 
is cool' distcc
Zeroconf announcing 'distcc' service named 'pvdabeel' with ip 
134.184.65.92 on port 1234 and extra arguments 'This is cool'

Looking up services:

# Getting pointers to available nodes
root@research ZeroConf # ./lookup 12 _distcc._tcp.local.
PTR _distcc._tcp.local. to pvdabeel._distcc._tcp.local.

# Use a pointer to get an IP
root@research ZeroConf # ./lookup 1 distcc-pvdabeel.local.
A distcc-pvdabeel.local. to ip 92.65.184.134

# Use a pointer to get a PORT
root@research ZeroConf # ./lookup 33 pvdabeel._distcc._tcp.local.
SRV pvdabeel._distcc._tcp.local. to distcc-pvdabeel.local.:1234

# Use a pointer to get the extra arguments
root@research ZeroConf # ./lookup 16 pvdabeel._distcc._tcp.local.
TXT pvdabeel._distcc._tcp.local. contains args=This is cool

Pieter

> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
>


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Embedded Gentoo

[Luke-Jr]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 03 November 2003 06:31 pm, Pieter Van den Abeele wrote:
> For automatic discovery of distributed cross compiling nodes, take a
> look at my zeroconf service lookup/announcement implementation on
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~pvdabeel/.
>
> The idea of zeroconf distributed cross compilation is similar to
> Apple's Xcode implementation:
>
> When somebody announces a service, zeroconf A, SRV, TXT and PTR DNS
> records are created:

Looks like you're either implementing or recreating RFC 2052... o.o
- -- 
Luke-Jr
Developer, Gentoo Linux
http://www.gentoo.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/pqGOZl/BHdU+lYMRAszhAJ9r43ReK4BsuqjAw9tXihfvfFScxACgipCp
n6PrqVrzNxoyo8kixGfXYo8=
=rzDE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Embedded Gentoo

[Chris PeBenito]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 882 bytes --]

On Sat, 2003-11-01 at 22:01, Chris PeBenito wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-11-01 at 21:26, Luke-Jr wrote:
> > Is there a list of devices we'd be concentrating on yet? I'd be 
> > interested in running such a distro on my Zaurus SL-C760. Also, ideas 
> > for GUIs might be spyderous's <1MB X11 server and Opie. Don't think we 
> > can fit KDE/GNOME into the 64MB tho ;)

I put up a rudimentary draft project page:

http://dev.gentoo.org/~pebenito/embedded.html

Really whats to note is the subprojects, which is just my idea of how
things are laid out.  Everything on the page is pretty much open to
discussion (esp. since there isn't much).

-- 
Chris PeBenito
<pebenito@gentoo.org>
Developer, SELinux
Hardened Gentoo Linux
 
Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE6AF9243
Key fingerprint = B0E6 877A 883F A57A 8E6A  CB00 BC8E E42D E6AF 9243

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Embedded Gentoo

[Paul de Vrieze]

[-- Attachment #1: signed data --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 647 bytes --]

On Monday 03 November 2003 18:57, david@futuretel.com wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 01:50:51AM -0600, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> > Seemless cross-compiler distcc support in portage.
>
> I second that.  Although seemless cross-compilation would be a good
> first step ;-)
>

I think that indeed it would be nice if someone could pickup where gcc-config 
left when zynot was created. I would also hope that in the future portage 
would support paralel installation of packages of the same version (if 
supported by that ebuild)

Paul

-- 
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net

[-- Attachment #2: signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Embedded Gentoo

[Douglas Russell]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 04 November 2003 11:00 am, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Monday 03 November 2003 18:57, david@futuretel.com wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 01:50:51AM -0600, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> > > Seemless cross-compiler distcc support in portage.
> >
> > I second that.  Although seemless cross-compilation would be a good
> > first step ;-)
>

That's a giant leap. I had a looking at setting up a cross-compilation tool 
chain. Wasn't pretty. Basically I made a big mess and it didn't work. If 
anyone else wants to work on this I'd be interested in helping. I have x86 
and pcc so I can test things properly.

> I think that indeed it would be nice if someone could pickup where
> gcc-config left when zynot was created. I would also hope that in the
> future portage would support paralel installation of packages of the same
> version (if supported by that ebuild)
>
> Paul

Agreed.

Puggy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/p6g5XYnvgFdTojMRAivhAJ4j6W7pxngklTRPd9wN/O18NR364ACfW/4F
HG5wkdUbABmF8WaH1Qpbj9k=
=jiys
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Embedded Gentoo

[Stroller]

On Nov 3, 2003, at 6:31 pm, Pieter Van den Abeele wrote:

> Hiya,
>
> On 03 Nov 2003, at 18:57, david@futuretel.com wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 01:50:51AM -0600, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
>>> Seemless cross-compiler distcc support in portage.
>>
>> I second that.  Although seemless cross-compilation would be a good
>> first step ;-)
>
> For automatic discovery of distributed cross compiling nodes, take a 
> look at my zeroconf service lookup/announcement implementation on 
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~pvdabeel/.
>
> The idea of zeroconf distributed cross compilation is similar to 
> Apple's Xcode implementation:

Cool. I'm also an OS X & Linux user, and it sounds like you're working 
on some of the features I'm really interested in. I'd really love to be 
able to use my DP G4 (running OS X) to compile stuff for my PC Linux 
boxes.

I'm also very glad to see an implementation of ZeroConf / Rendezvous 
for Linux, although i don't know yet what I might do with it. Any 
chance of an ebuild..?

Do let me know (perhaps via the gentoo-osx@gentoo.org list?) if you 
need any testing doing.

Stroller.


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Embedded Gentoo

[Chris PeBenito]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 792 bytes --]

It appears that the gentoo-embedded mail list is (still) available.  I
invite everyone thats interested in the project to subscribe.  Then we
can move the discussion there, and really get things started.

On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 19:19, Chris PeBenito wrote: 
> I put up a rudimentary draft project page:
> 
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~pebenito/embedded.html
> 
> Really whats to note is the subprojects, which is just my idea of how
> things are laid out.  Everything on the page is pretty much open to
> discussion (esp. since there isn't much).


-- 
Chris PeBenito
<pebenito@gentoo.org>
Developer, SELinux
Hardened Gentoo Linux
 
Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE6AF9243
Key fingerprint = B0E6 877A 883F A57A 8E6A  CB00 BC8E E42D E6AF 9243

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[gentoo-dev] Re: Embedded Gentoo

[Michael Kunze]

Chris PeBenito wrote:
> It appears that the gentoo-embedded mail list is (still) available.  I
> invite everyone thats interested in the project to subscribe.  Then we
> can move the discussion there, and really get things started.

isn't available via news.gmane.org
any ideas why?

-- 
Michael Kunze

Yo Mama's so old she owes Jesus Christ a quarter



--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list