From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3466 invoked by uid 1002); 28 Oct 2003 16:15:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 4058 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2003 16:15:45 -0000 Message-ID: <3F9E966F.8060509@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 11:16:47 -0500 From: Kumba Reply-To: kumba@gentoo.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20030925 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <20031028145858.5c7ecc4d.cphil@cphil.net> In-Reply-To: <20031028145858.5c7ecc4d.cphil@cphil.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ppc cross-compiler X-Archives-Salt: 408c0d85-2d40-4142-8ad8-7960bb82ff6a X-Archives-Hash: f88483f83ce53aaa939c0c9f2c723b86 Philippe Coulonges wrote: > Something puzzles me. > > The gcc ebuild seems ready to handle installation of a cross-compiler, > but the binutils ebuild don't. > > Is there a purpose ? > Is it a work in progress ? > Did I miss something ? > > CU > CPHIL I'm unsure how tested that ability it. I made some ebuilds for binutils/gcc sparc/mips64 support, and in doing so, inadvertently made them capable of building cross-compilers. I'm also working on a script to do cross-compilers that I hope to put into portage maybe within another week or so....still beating the bugs out of it. --Kumba -- "Such is oft the course of deeds that move the wheels of the world: small hands do them because they must, while the eyes of the great are elsewhere." --Elrond -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list