From: Andrew Gaffney <agaffney@technaut.darktalker.net>
To: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] wxGTK {up|down}grade loop
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 15:23:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F9ADBC0.8040603@technaut.darktalker.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200310252201.05141.pauldv@gentoo.org>
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
>>I've seen this kind of thing a few times before, most notably with avifile
>>and drip. In this case, there is an update available for wxGTK, so portage
>>upgrades it. Unfortunately, there is some program installed that requires
>>on a version of wxGTK <=2.4.0, so portage downgrades it to not break the
>>other program. I consider this behavior a portage bug, but as far as I
>>know, there is currently no easy way to prevent this from happening.
>
>
> To fix this problem we need a dependency checker that works with the whole
> installed tree, and validates it. We currently don't have such a checker and
> the current checker cannot be adapted to do that either. The problem is that
> it is very hard to make a checker to do forward and backward dependency
> checking and still being efficient.
>
> We are working on this, and it is certainly high on our list of desired
> features, but currently there is not much to fix this.
I'm not very good with Python, but I'm interested in helping to design a better dependency
checker. Could you give me a summary of the way the checker currently works or point me to
a document that describes it? Or should I just learn Python?
--
Andrew Gaffney
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-25 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-25 17:43 [gentoo-dev] wxGTK {up|down}grade loop Ruben Vermeersch
2003-10-25 17:58 ` Andrew Gaffney
2003-10-25 20:00 ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-10-25 20:23 ` Andrew Gaffney [this message]
2003-10-25 20:39 ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-10-25 20:58 ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-10-25 23:17 ` Grant Goodyear
2003-10-27 6:11 ` Andrew Gaffney
[not found] ` <20031025200632.GA5274@whitestar>
2003-10-27 6:01 ` Andrew Gaffney
2003-10-25 18:16 ` Brian Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F9ADBC0.8040603@technaut.darktalker.net \
--to=agaffney@technaut.darktalker.net \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox