From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3554 invoked by uid 1002); 17 Oct 2003 21:20:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 31529 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2003 21:20:00 -0000 Message-ID: <3F905CF8.2040402@lasierra.edu> Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 14:19:52 -0700 From: Brian Friday Reply-To: bfriday@lasierra.edu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030909 Thunderbird/0.3a X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Robbins CC: "Brett I.Holcomb" , gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <1066370641.16395.47.camel@ht.gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <1066370641.16395.47.camel@ht.gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] xfce4-session ebuild problem X-Archives-Salt: 83cdbe31-f32c-4c63-922c-a48f5d9d527b X-Archives-Hash: e8e1d57c743dfc157b177b4322423949 Hi all, I'd vote to unmask it, as I and a colleague here at work have had it running since September 30ish using the official release of 4 without a problem. Without knowing more about the RC breakage I can't be sure it won't break for others but in daily use I've not had problems (bugs doesn't return any submission relating to xfce4-session). my lurking 2cents - Brian Daniel Robbins wrote: > > I unmasked it on amd64, but it was masked on everything before. > According to the ChangeLog, apparently it conflicted with the xfce4 > beta. Not sure if it should be unmasked or if I should re-mask on amd64, > so cc'ing bcowan on this for more info. > > Regards, > > Daniel -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list