From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24017 invoked by uid 1002); 8 Sep 2003 08:16:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 32564 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2003 08:16:39 -0000 Message-ID: <3F5C3B53.7060801@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 04:18:27 -0400 From: Kumba Reply-To: kumba@gentoo.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <1062966830.8455.203.camel@nosferatu.lan> <20030907234744.6e742cca.spider@gentoo.org> <200309081643.45439.jasonbstubbs@mailandnews.com> In-Reply-To: <200309081643.45439.jasonbstubbs@mailandnews.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-3.3.1-r1 X-Archives-Salt: 7c601cc6-d3f8-4108-be5f-afe54baca529 X-Archives-Hash: 92b69a6389895ebf2c0fc3c7c5194b54 Jason Stubbs wrote: > So, does this mean I should file a bug report for all the packages I've been > unable to compile with gcc331 (if not listed already)? Some I've got patches > for - file those too? Should I have done this already? Yeah, assign them to gcc-porting@gentoo.org. I'm on that alias, although if any of the patches involves X applications, I won't be of much help (don't run X, so can't easily test them). --Kumba -- "Such is oft the course of deeds that move the wheels of the world: small hands do them because they must, while the eyes of the great are elsewhere." --Elrond -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list