From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9351 invoked by uid 1002); 5 Sep 2003 14:55:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 27495 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2003 14:55:44 -0000 Message-ID: <3F58A457.70905@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 10:57:27 -0400 From: Kumba Reply-To: kumba@gentoo.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <200309050913.35962.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200309050913.35962.vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] masking glibc-2.3.2-r3 X-Archives-Salt: 258f0f7a-3ddb-4ff8-823c-92156beec8f9 X-Archives-Hash: f5fe14b56510b1ba38d15274510c5b84 Mike Frysinger wrote: > anyone have any qualms with me changing the masking on glibc-2.3.2-r3 from > KEYWORDS="-*" to package.mask ? > ive been using it for quite sometime and was just about to update to NPTL-0.57 > (released like 2 days ago) when i realized i still inject the latest unstable > version of glibc so that my glibc's dont get screwed up ... i prefer to put > masked stuff in package.mask and then unmask in package.unmask ... > -mike I actually have the 20030822 branch update for a glibc-2.3.2-r4 if you want me to put that into Portage. I thought Azarah might've gotten around to it by now, but he may be really busy. I've been using this -r4 prototype on sparc and x86 for about 2 weeks now w/o any issues so far. --Kumba -- "Such is oft the course of deeds that move the wheels of the world: small hands do them because they must, while the eyes of the great are elsewhere." --Elrond -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list