[gentoo-dev] Non-x86 arches: Is distcc-2.8-r2 stable?

[gentoo-dev] Non-x86 arches: Is distcc-2.8-r2 stable?

[Lisa Marie Seelye]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 287 bytes --]

Well guys?  Anyone brave enough to use distcc-2.8-r2 on a non-x86 arch? 
I think its time to get those other arches up to date.  Let me know if
there are any problems or if I can bump them up!


-- 
Regards,
-Lisa
<Vix ulla tam iniqua pax, quin bello vel aequissimo sit potior>

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Non-x86 arches: Is distcc-2.8-r2 stable?

[Lisa Marie Seelye]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 532 bytes --]

On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 20:41, Lisa Marie Seelye wrote:
> Well guys?  Anyone brave enough to use distcc-2.8-r2 on a non-x86 arch? 
> I think its time to get those other arches up to date.  Let me know if
> there are any problems or if I can bump them up!

Well since I haven't heard anything from the non-x86 people I'm going to
bump 2.8-r2 to stable on those arches and 2.9 to x86 (I'll post a formal
announcement after I get 2.10 in).

-- 
Regards,
-Lisa
<Vix ulla tam iniqua pax, quin bello vel aequissimo sit potior>

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Non-x86 arches: Is distcc-2.8-r2 stable?

[Jason Wever]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 980 bytes --]

On 11 Aug 2003 13:19:28 -0400
Lisa Marie Seelye <lisa@gentoo.org> wrote:

> Well since I haven't heard anything from the non-x86 people I'm going to
> bump 2.8-r2 to stable on those arches and 2.9 to x86 (I'll post a formal
> announcement after I get 2.10 in).

(Note: this is in general as well as specifically to this instance).

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE DO NOT MAKE THIS DEFAULT BEHAVIOR.

Right now most non-x86 arches have a small number of devs and a small
amount of time in which to test.  

I would like to request (was going to GLEP it when time permits) that if
you want to test something for an arch you can't test, please make a bug
for it.  This way it's sure to get visibility and you actually know that
an arch person tested it.  Mailing lists are a poor way to ask for testing
and the testing requests are easily lost in the myraids of email that a
dev has to read when they get home from work/school/whatever each day.

Thanks,
-- 
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Lead

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Non-x86 arches: Is distcc-2.8-r2 stable?

[Michael Cummings]

On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 01:19:28PM -0400, Lisa Marie Seelye wrote:
> Well since I haven't heard anything from the non-x86 people I'm going to
> bump 2.8-r2 to stable on those arches and 2.9 to x86 (I'll post a formal
> announcement after I get 2.10 in).

*eek!!*

/me hides from the fall out

seriously, would not recommend it. Have you assigned bugs to the arch's for
testing? x86 is easy, but for the arch's there's always a lack of manpower
undercutting their ability to test new stuff - they're usually busy making
sure the currently supported stuff is still working.


-- 


-----o()o---------------------------------------------
              |  http://www.gentoo.org/
              |  #gentoo-dev  on irc.freenode.net
Gentoo Dev    |  #gentoo-perl on irc.freenode.net
Perl Guy      |
              |  GnuPG Key ID:       AB5CED4E9E7F4E2E
-----o()o---------------------------------------------


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Non-x86 arches: Is distcc-2.8-r2 stable?

[Lisa Marie Seelye]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 509 bytes --]

On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 15:12, Michael Cummings wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 01:19:28PM -0400, Lisa Marie Seelye wrote:
> > Well since I haven't heard anything from the non-x86 people I'm going to
> > bump 2.8-r2 to stable on those arches and 2.9 to x86 (I'll post a formal
> > announcement after I get 2.10 in).
> 
> *eek!!*


Alright, alright.

Guess it is a bit much to ask for feedback on a mail list.

-- 
Regards,
-Lisa
<Vix ulla tam iniqua pax, quin bello vel aequissimo sit potior>

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Non-x86 arches: Is distcc-2.8-r2 stable?

[Kumba]

Lisa Marie Seelye wrote:

> Alright, alright.
> 
> Guess it is a bit much to ask for feedback on a mail list.

I just haven't gotten around to this yet for mips.  I need to rebuild my 
sparc->mips crosscompiler, but My last attempt at distcc was not all too 
friendly...

Trying to work on a stageball for mips atm, just these blasted power 
outages need to stop.  Got a bit of a list of packages to test aside 
from distcc.

--Kumba

-- 
"Such is oft the course of deeds that move the wheels of the world: 
small hands do them because they must, while the eyes of the great are 
elsewhere."  --Elrond


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list