From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13595 invoked by uid 1002); 26 Jul 2003 10:11:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 6175 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2003 10:11:43 -0000 Message-ID: <3F2253D6.2050803@ifi.uio.no> Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 12:11:34 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=E5vard_Wall?= Organization: University of Oslo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030619 X-Accept-Language: Norwegian, no, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org CC: stuart@gentoo.org References: <200307251956.27193.ripat@xs4all.nl> <200307252052.09728.werner.van.belle@vub.ac.be> <3F22506A.8050902@ifi.uio.no> <200307261105.43699.stuart@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200307261105.43699.stuart@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner-Information: This message has been scanned for viruses/spam. Contact postmaster@uio.no if you have questions about this scanning. X-UiO-MailScanner: No virus found Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] compile time statistics X-Archives-Salt: fff97ec3-b786-4ba6-b9fa-716368922e99 X-Archives-Hash: 349a862368b4ae380dd8d601189f59d6 Stuart Herbert wrote: > Whoever actually implements these ideas, please don't forget that you need a > solution for capturing accurate stats on machines that use Portage's distcc > support. Because otherwise, your stats will not be as accurate as you'd > like. Woah! So true. And what about ccache? That could really mess up statistics! I guess you would have to disregard such timings... -- hw -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list