From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22568 invoked by uid 1002); 23 Jul 2003 18:07:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 26973 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2003 18:07:07 -0000 Message-ID: <3F1ECEAC.1000904@codewordt.co.uk> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 19:06:36 +0100 From: Dhruba Bandopadhyay Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Rickard , gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <20030723121603.11ab807e.frogger@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20030723121603.11ab807e.frogger@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Where to put prerelease vanilla kernels? X-Archives-Salt: 5c8ec27b-a86c-4afa-8f8e-caa3dd420315 X-Archives-Hash: 90a0bfbb2eee8dc1cf58bdcd72e080b1 Matt Rickard wrote: > Portage currently does not contain any vanilla prerelease kernels (i.e. > 2.4.22_pre7). Bug 25107 is a request for this, and it seems reasonable > to have these kernels in portage, since we have pretty much every other > kernel branch you could think of in there :) Yes. Absolutely right. > I'm wondering what's the best way to handle these? First option is to How about splitting development-sources into 2.6.x and 2.4.x trees? It's not like 2.6.x is the only branch undergoing 'development'. As to how to split this I'll leave up to you. Adding a suffix to it to give rise to two categories may be an idea. Just some thoughts. With regards. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list