From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 633 invoked by uid 1002); 20 Jul 2003 15:40:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 13675 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2003 15:40:44 -0000 Message-ID: <3F1AC537.3000705@codewordt.co.uk> Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 17:37:11 +0100 From: Dhruba Bandopadhyay Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stuart@gentoo.org, gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <20030719085050.GB32752@cherenkov.orbis-terrarum.net> <200307201314.56197.stuart@gentoo.org> <3F1A9711.3090009@codewordt.co.uk> <200307201436.27968.stuart@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200307201436.27968.stuart@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] New dev - stuart & turck-mmcache X-Archives-Salt: 29833b25-eb7a-45ec-b708-9abf559e3fc1 X-Archives-Hash: 9b1ad761142d1c51c62530d414a37a5b Stuart Herbert wrote: > On Sunday 20 July 2003 2:20 pm, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote: > > >>http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24871 > > > I've committed a patch from Mike Gardiner which hopefully will fix the problem > for you. I'll make sure that I test all future ebuilds using the sandbox > feature too ;-) I did the following and all worked fine. 1 - sync 2 - re-emerge 3 - cp mmcache.php to webroot 4 - restart apache 5 - test phpinfo > I appreciate the feedback on the ebuild! My pleasure. Incidentally, where can I get a bulky php example that would allow me to test the differences in speed between cached and non-cached php? At the moment, I can't really tell whether it has made any difference. With regards. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list