From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29068 invoked by uid 1002); 17 Jul 2003 09:40:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 13284 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2003 09:40:15 -0000 Message-ID: <3F167C6A.9090104@codewordt.co.uk> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 11:37:30 +0100 From: Dhruba Bandopadhyay Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <20030713154724.3dca65b1.ian@ihtruelsen.dyndns.org> <1058232599.1936.19.camel@localhost> <3F13D843.50103@codewordt.co.uk> <1058357435.7364.6.camel@localhost> <1058359077.12981.58.camel@vertigo> <1058359696.6408.4.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1058359696.6408.4.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] **HEADS UP** Apache2 + MySQL4 moving to stable status X-Archives-Salt: bdae74ec-9cf7-4b90-a8dc-59e3fde22aa5 X-Archives-Hash: f200302005beeaba0eb84d4bf1a49841 Andrew Cowie wrote: > On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 22:37, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > >>How exactly are you adding the applications to >>/etc/portage/profiles/package.mask? I found that adding >> >>>=net-www/apache-2.0.0 worked perfectly to keep apache at 1.x > > > That is exactly what I have in /etc/portage/profiles/package.mask, and > yet emerge still wants to bring in 2.0.47 . If I make that change to the > package.mask in /usr/portage/profiles, it behaves. [Until the next > emerge rsync, of course] > > It's almost as if portage is ignoring that directory. > > Is there a change to some central config file (make.conf? make.globals?) > That I may somehow have missed? Some new environment / make variable? > The rest of my tree seems up to date (I did an emerge world not too long > ago) > > AfC > > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > This seems to be an extremely temperamental feature and is not documented anywhere AFAIK. For me /etc/portage/package.unmask worked on ~x86 but not on x86. The only thing I can suggest is that you speak to carpaski on irc. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list