From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3007 invoked by uid 1002); 14 Jul 2003 18:32:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 29060 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2003 18:32:50 -0000 Message-ID: <3F12F74D.4070805@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 14:32:45 -0400 From: Stewart Honsberger Organization: Gentoo Technologies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030710 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vapier@gentoo.org Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <200307140214.37747.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200307140214.37747.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.76.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Warning about -march=k6* X-Archives-Salt: 6fcd6ed6-5482-4919-97ec-4646f4d865fe X-Archives-Hash: 13b01e1ae0f99b6b9d9694aa3c6073c8 Mike Frysinger wrote: > i have seen many bugs where people who have used -march=k6* in their CFLAGS > experienced segfaults, compile failures, etc... > > i'd like to propose adding a warning to make.conf to deter ppl from using > these flags ... rather i'd suggest they use -mcpu=k6* ... > > the bug can be found at http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24379 > i just want to know if anyone out there has had *success* with this flag ... My entire server (AMD K62-400) is built around -march=k6; stage1 ground-up, however I am using the 1.2 profile with GCC 2.95. Does -march=k6-2 exist for 2.95? I'd hate to destabalize my server to test, but I might be able to scrounge up another of the same chip and motherboard. -- Stewart Honsberger Gentoo Developer http://www.snerk.org/ -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list